Minnesota legislators introduce what could possibly become the first law to curtail payers' rights to determine which biologics patients have access to.
Legislators in Minnesota have introduced a bill that would broaden access to biosimilars by requiring health plans and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to cover all versions of biological agents, including biosimilars. The bill is a response to payer policies that sometimes narrow choices of biosimilars and reference products and may force providers and patients to use agents that are more costly than other versions of the same biologics.
“The change would give all patients access to the most affordable and effective version of their medication without compromising safety standards,” Representative Jennifer Schultz (D, Duluth) and Senator Carla Nelson (R, Rochester) said in a statement announcing the bill (SF 990). Schultz said the draft legislation was developed in consultation with research scientists at Essentia Health and Mayo Clinic.
“Biosimilar medications are just as safe and effective as their brand counterparts,” said Eric Tichy, vice chair of Mayo Clinic Pharmacy Supply Solutions. “They are also the most powerful tool we have to control the cost of prescription drugs. Facilitating provider prescribing of biosimilar products for patients supports high-quality care and reduces delays and red tape while also managing the high costs of medication."
According to the language of the bill, PBMs and health plans would not be permitted to prefer or require the use of reference biologics, biosimilars to reference products, or biologics deemed “interchangeable” to reference biologics. If a PBM or health carrier offers coverage of a reference product or biosimilar, it must also cover all versions of that same drug, including reference and biosimilars.
Also under the bill, the Minnesota commissioner of health would be required to track the legislation’s effect on net prices for different payers of biological products, interchangeable biological products, and biosimilar products.
JD Supra, the legal news website, stated that the bill if enacted would produce the first law of this kind. The bill’s supporters have chosen January 1, 2022 as the proposed go-live date.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Physician and Patient Perspectives After Starting or Switching to Amgevita in IBD
March 23rd 2024A real-world study surveying physicians and patients on adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) found both patients initiating ABP 501 and those who had switched from the reference product had higher satisfaction levels.
Biosimilars Rheumatology Roundup for February 2024—Podcast Edition
March 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® revisited all the major rheumatology biosimilar news from February 2024, including the FDA approval of the 10th adalimumab biosimilar, the promise for an oral delivery system for ustekinumab, and the impact of adalimumab products on COVID-19 antibodies.
Webinar Addresses Solutions to Improve Adalimumab Biosimilar Uptake
March 18th 2024Government policies, including those related to prescribing incentives and interchangeability, need to be reworked to encourage biosimilar adoption and create meaningful savings for health systems, according to speakers at a recent webinar.
BioRationality: MHRA's Procedure Enables Automatic Registration of Biosimilars Approved Elsewhere
March 18th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, explains how the new international recognition procedure under the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) could expand biosimilar access within the United Kingdom, in his latest column.