Minnesota legislators introduce what could possibly become the first law to curtail payers' rights to determine which biologics patients have access to.
Legislators in Minnesota have introduced a bill that would broaden access to biosimilars by requiring health plans and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to cover all versions of biological agents, including biosimilars. The bill is a response to payer policies that sometimes narrow choices of biosimilars and reference products and may force providers and patients to use agents that are more costly than other versions of the same biologics.
“The change would give all patients access to the most affordable and effective version of their medication without compromising safety standards,” Representative Jennifer Schultz (D, Duluth) and Senator Carla Nelson (R, Rochester) said in a statement announcing the bill (SF 990). Schultz said the draft legislation was developed in consultation with research scientists at Essentia Health and Mayo Clinic.
“Biosimilar medications are just as safe and effective as their brand counterparts,” said Eric Tichy, vice chair of Mayo Clinic Pharmacy Supply Solutions. “They are also the most powerful tool we have to control the cost of prescription drugs. Facilitating provider prescribing of biosimilar products for patients supports high-quality care and reduces delays and red tape while also managing the high costs of medication."
According to the language of the bill, PBMs and health plans would not be permitted to prefer or require the use of reference biologics, biosimilars to reference products, or biologics deemed “interchangeable” to reference biologics. If a PBM or health carrier offers coverage of a reference product or biosimilar, it must also cover all versions of that same drug, including reference and biosimilars.
Also under the bill, the Minnesota commissioner of health would be required to track the legislation’s effect on net prices for different payers of biological products, interchangeable biological products, and biosimilar products.
JD Supra, the legal news website, stated that the bill if enacted would produce the first law of this kind. The bill’s supporters have chosen January 1, 2022 as the proposed go-live date.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.