Antibodies that deplete B cells, including rituximab, have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of neurological conditions such as progressive multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. The efficacy of these treatments hinges on adequate B-cell depletion, but there is a lack of standardization in treatment and monitoring protocols to guide clinical practice.
Antibodies that deplete B cells, including rituximab, have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of neurological conditions such as progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The efficacy of these treatments hinges on adequate B-cell depletion, but there is a lack of standardization in treatment and monitoring protocols to guide clinical practice.
In order to identify factors that impact repopulation of B cells after depletion therapy in patients with neurological diseases, researchers, reporting their findings in Neurology, Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, analyzed CD19+ B-cell counts in neurology patients who had been treated at least 1 time with a B-cell depleting therapy.
The researchers identified patients in the neurology department of a single center in Germany between 2007 and 2017 and used their anonymized data to determine CD19+ cell counts obtained by flow cytometry.
In total, 45 patients, with a total of 373 observations, were identified. The majority of patients received treatment for MS or NMOSD, although patients with polyneuropathy, myasthenia, cerebral vasculitis, and other diseases were also included. Forty-two patients received rituximab, and another 3 received ocrelizumab as part of a clinical trial program. Most (71.1%) patients received doses adapted to body surface area (375 mg/m2), while the remaining patients received fixed doses.
The researchers found that 37 patients experienced at least 1 event of CD19+ repopulation (CD19+ cells rising to a level above 1% of total CD45+ lymphocytes after depletion). The earliest repopulation occurred after 108 days, and the latest occurred after 554 days. Patients who had higher body surface area (and dosages ranging from 574 mg to 975 mg) had a higher risk of experiencing repopulation than patients with lower body surface area, even when they received an adapted dose (hazard ratio, 1.015 per cm2; P <.05); with every 10-cm2 increase, the time to cell repopulation was reduced by 14 days.
Several patients received more than 1 treatment cycle of rituximab, and 18 patients had sufficient data to compare B-cell repopulation over time in the same patient; the researchers found no clear pattern in B-cell recovery after the first and last treatment.
“It is important to not miss the time point of B-cell repopulation, as this is most likely linked to resurging disease activity, at least in patients with MS and [NMOSD],” write the authors, who note that “monitoring of B cells is recommended with special attendance to [high—body surface area] patients to not miss the early repopulators.” The researchers propose that patients receiving treatment for neurologic diseases be monitored after 2 and 4 months, then biweekly to every 4 weeks thereafter.
Additionally, the researchers say, future investigations of B-cell depleting therapies in neurological diseases should address both dosing protocol and biomarkers beyond CD19+ cells in the peripheral blood; potential biomarkers that could prove useful include memory and effector B cells.
Reference
Ellwardt E, Ellwardt L, Bittner S, Zipp F. Monitoring B-cell repopulation after depletion therapy in neurologic patients. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018;5(4):e463. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000463.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Patients With IBD Maintain Therapy 2 Years Post Switching to Infliximab Biosimilar
March 23rd 2025People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched to the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 had higher treatment persistence (84% and 91%) than those new to infliximab (66% and 53%), with no new safety concerns.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Eye on Pharma: Korean Drugmakers’ Impact in Europe; New Denosumab, Eculizumab Deals
January 11th 2025Korean drugmakers hold over 50% market share in the 6 best-selling biosimilar markets, 2 companies sign exclusive licensing partnership for a denosumab biosimilar, and 2 others join forces for an eculizumab biosimilar.