With patents on reference products that treat multiple sclerosis (MS) set to expire soon in the region, a panel of experts in Latin America recently published a set of recommendations regarding the efficacy, safety, and quality of biosimilars in these countries.
With patents on reference products that treat multiple sclerosis (MS) set to expire soon in the region, a panel of experts in Latin America recently published a set of recommendations regarding the efficacy, safety, and quality of biosimilars in these countries.
As in other regions, the expanding use of biosimilars is due to interest in reducing costs, promoting the sustainability of healthcare systems, and improving patient access.
The Latin American Forum of Experts in Multiple Sclerosis gathered experts from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela to discuss good practices and risks associated with the use of biosimilar drugs and to develop a set of recommendations as the market expands.
Each country was assessed on its approval of biosimilar drugs by regulatory agencies, use of biosimilar drugs, pharmacovigilance plans and risk management strategies, and knowledge of the latest different molecules.
The availability of MS drugs varies by country and is thus far limited to biosimilar interferons and glatiramer acetate or glatiramoids and other disease-modifying agents, including natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab.
Original immunomodulatory drugs used for MS treatment have already lost their patents and newer drugs will lose their patents within the next 10 years.
However, every nation’s approval and regulatory process is different; moreover, not every country has pharmacovigilance programs that includes adverse event reporting in the post-marketing phase.
Biosimilars are in use in Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru, and are expected to expand to other countries in the region.
Brazil is considered to have one of the more advanced regulations regarding biosimilars, as is Argentina, a major manufacturer in Latin America. Other countries, such as Bolivia, are still developing regulations. Countries such as Chile, Mexico, and Venezuela, where foreign exchange controls are in place, are expected to expand.
The Latin American Forum of Experts in Multiple Sclerosis, an independent forum for reaching consensus about MS issues, recommends that each country:
Reference
Steinberg J, Fragoso YD, Duran Quiroz JC, et al. Practical issues concerning the approval and use of biosimilar drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis in Latin America [published online May 24, 2019]. Neurol Ther. doi: 10.1007/s40120-019-0139-y.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Omalizumab Biosimilar Shows Equivalent Efficacy as Multiple Sclerosis Treatment
November 26th 2024The phase 3 trial (NCT04966338) found that a biosimilar ocrelizumab candidate (Xacrel) was equivalent to Ocrevus in reducing the annualized relapse rate and showed comparable safety and efficacy in treating relapsing multiple sclerosis over 96 weeks.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.