A new bill (HR 8877) introduced to the House of Representatives is seeking to remove barriers that prevent the substitution of reference products with interchangeable biosimilars to support utilization of and access to lower-cost therapies.
The Biologics Competition Act of 2022 (HR 8877), a bill aiming to make interchangeable biosimilars more accessible for patients in the United States, was introduced in the House of Representatives.
The bill is sponsored by Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks, R-Iowa, and it was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The legislation has received bipartisan support, including from Representatives Greg Murphy, R-North Carolina; Nanette Barragán, D-California; and Ann (Annie) Kuster, D-New Hampshire.
If passed and signed into law, the bill would task HHS with conducting a study that could assess current challenges to substituting reference biologics with biosimilars and interchangeable biologics. The results would then be shared with Congress. The hope is that the results can help Congressional leaders identify potential policy solutions that can increase public trust in interchangeable products and biosimilars and remove barriers to their utilization.
HHS would also be directed to update the FDA’s Purple Book, a list of licensed biological products and patent disclosures, and adjust it to better align communications related to the interchangeability of reference products and biosimilars.
Changes to the Purple Books should “harmonize the approach for communicating the substitutability of interchangeable biological products with the approach for communicating therapeutics equivalence ratings assigned to drugs, with the goals of minimizing impediments to substitution…and maintaining the distinct pathways by which biological products are licensed under…the Public Health Service Act and drugs are approved under…the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,” according to the bill’s text.
The bill comes after the first provision of the Inflation Reduction Act that impacts biosimilars, a 5-year temporary increase in the add-on payment for qualifying biosimilars to encourage their utilization, went into effect. Additionally, the European Medicines Agency declared all biosimilars interchangeable with their reference products in September.
Recently, Cimerli, the first interchangeable ophthalmology biosimilar, entered the US market, making it the second interchangeable biosimilar to be made available to American patients, following the relaunch of Semglee (insulin glargine biosimilar) with an interchangeable label.
In response to the bill’s introduction in Congress, Vizient, a member-driven health care performance improvement company, issued a response showing its support of HR 8877. Vizient thanked the Congressional leaders who signed onto the legislation and vowed to work with them, other government partners, including the FDA, and Vizient members to improve adoption of biosimilars and interchangeable products.
“Biosimilars have proven to be safe and effective while providing significant cost savings for providers and patients. In fact, biosimilars contributed over $12.6 billion in savings in the U.S. from 2015 through 2022. This effort to improve the substitution process for interchangeable biological products will make affordable and life-saving medications more accessible to those in need while reducing costs,” said Steven Lucio, senior principal of pharmacy solutions at Vizient, in a statement.
Vizient also sent a letter to the bill sponsors alerting them to Vizient’s support and stressing the importance of progressing HR 8877: “Despite the growing number of biosimilar products entering the market and seeking to be designated as interchangeable, confusion persists among clinicians and payers as to the substitution of interchangeable biosimilars with originator biologics. Your important bipartisan legislation offers concrete solutions to minimize obstacles to the substitution of interchangeable biologics.”
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Comparable Pregnancy and Infant Milestones With Infliximab Biosimilars vs Originator in IBD
March 15th 2025A study evaluating pregnancy outcomes and infant developmental milestones found similar outcomes between pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who received reference infliximab and those who received a biosimilar.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Cases to Watch: Prolia/Xgeva and Denosumab Competitors
March 11th 2025The denosumab biosimilar market is poised for disruption with 3 FDA-approved biosimilars, at least 5 awaiting approval, and launches anticipated to start in May 2025, while ongoing patent litigation continues to shape the competitive landscape.