Samsung Bioepis’ biosimilar adalimumab, SB5, has been approved in the European Union under the name Imraldi on the basis of clinical studies including a phase 3 study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Now that the biosimilar has begun to make its way to EU patients, investigators are publishing new data on other key facets of the product, including its shelf life and device usability.
Samsung Bioepis’ biosimilar adalimumab, SB5, has been approved in the European Union under the name Imraldi on the basis of clinical studies including a phase 3 study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Now that the biosimilar has begun to make its way to EU patients, investigators are publishing new data on other key facets of the product, including its shelf life and device usability.
In a paper newly published in Advances in Therapy1, investigators explained that SB5 is currently approved for storage between 2 to 8 degrees Celsius for 36 months, and may be stored at room temperature for a maximum of 14 days. In their study, the investigators sought to evaluate whether SB5, aged to its full shelf life of 36 months, could then be stored at room temperature for a period of 4 weeks. These conditions, they say, represent a worst-case scenario for medication storage in circumstances in which patients face long period without continuous access to refrigeration.
The investigators used 3 different batches of 36-month aged SB5 and stored them at room temperature for 4 weeks. They tested the samples at baseline and again at week 2 and 4.
According to the investigators, the color and clarity of the drug did not change over time, nor did the presence of visible particles. The pH of the product also remained stable for the 4-week period.
High—molecular weight impurities did not increase, the total purity of SB5 remained at or above 95.0%, and the degree of nonglycosylation of heavy antibody chains remained below 4.3% for 4 weeks, indicating that there was no degradation of the monoclonal antibodies. SB5’s biological activity remained stable over the 4-week period, as measured by competitive inhibition binding and TNF-alpha neutralization assays.
The paper’s authors conclude that SB5 remained stable and biologically active for 4 weeks at room temperature after aging to its shelf life, suggesting that the stability profile is 2 weeks longer than is currently approved in the European Union.
A separate investigation, published in Current Medical Research and Opinion2, sought to investigate a question that is key to patients who are being switched to a biosimilar: injection site pain and safety of injection with either a prefilled syringe or an autoinjector pen.
In the open-label study in 49 patients with RA, patients self-administered their 40-mg doses of adalimumab subcutaneously with a syringe at weeks 0 and 2 of the study, followed by an autoinjector at weeks 4 through 10. Patients rated their injection site pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6.
Mean injection site pain scores were equivalent between the prefilled syringe and autoinjector immediately after the injection (2.3 versus 2.0; 97.5% CI, −0.99-0.30) and 15 to 30 minutes after the injection (0.8 versus 0.7; 97.5% CI, −0.47-0.25). Patients reported that their overall impression of both devices was comparable, through their overall preference was for the autoinjector. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were all mild to moderate, and there were no serious AEs reported.
Overall, wrote the investigators, SB5 showed equivalent injection site pain and comparable safety when administered by either of the 2 injection devices.
Reference
1. Park D, Yun J, Hwang SJ, Park SJ. Evaluation of physicohemical and biological stability of 36-months-aged SB5 (adalimumab biosimilar) for 4 weeks at room temperature [published online December 15, 2018]. Adv Ther. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0851-5.
2. Ghil J, Zielinska A, Lee Y. Usability and safety of SB5 (an adalimumab biosimilar) prefilled syringe and autoinjector in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [published online December 18, 2018]. Curr Med Res Opin. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1560211.
Physician and Patient Perspectives After Starting or Switching to Amgevita in IBD
March 23rd 2024A real-world study surveying physicians and patients on adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) found both patients initiating ABP 501 and those who had switched from the reference product had higher satisfaction levels.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
The Role of Biosimilars: Advancing Access, Financial Health, and System Sustainability
March 11th 2024Kashyap Patel, MD, CEO of Carolina Blood and Cancer Care, a member of the Community Oncology Alliance, and member of The Center for Biosimilars® Advisory Board, glances back at the development of the biosimilar industry and the last 5 years of progress.
Pipelines and Preparation: How the US Can Prepare for More RA Biosimilars
April 16th 2023What can practices do to prepare for all the biosimilars to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) coming down the pipeline? And how can they ensure that the lower-than-anticipated adoption rates for infliximab biosimilars are not repeated? Robert Zutaut, RPh, from McKesson Provider Solutions, tackles all this and more on this episode of Not So Different.
Cardinal Health Report Showcases Biosimilar Growth, Provider and Payer Evolution, and More
February 29th 2024In its annual biosimilars report, Cardinal Health provided updates on how provider acceptance growth, evolving payer dynamics, and the growing pipeline for biosimilars will shape the biosimilar landscape over the next 5 years.
Biosimilar Substitution Within OCM Could Result in Lower Total Cost of Care
February 16th 2024Researchers found that the total cost of care per oncology episode was significantly lowered when biosimilar substitution was implemented in Medicare’s Oncology Care Model (OCM), suggesting that biosimilar uptake can serve as a critical tool to mitigate risk and improve financial performance for providers.