In its annual report, issued earlier this week, the Medicare program’s trustees said that Medicare will remain solvent until 2029, allowing the program to forestall triggering an Affordable Care Act provision to convene the Independent Payment Advisory Board.
In its annual report, issued earlier this week, the Medicare program’s trustees said that Medicare will remain solvent until 2029, allowing the program to forestall triggering an Affordable Care Act (ACA) provision to convene the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB).
The IPAB, a 15-member panel (or the HHS if such a panel cannot be convened), will be called upon when Medicare spending exceeds statutory benchmarks. The body will be required to provide recommendations to Congress on mandatory cost-cutting measures to control Medicare spending.
The IPAB provision of the ACA has been widely criticized by stakeholders, including the American Medical Association (AMA), which has advocated for a repeal of the provision. The AMA calls IPAB an “inflexible mandate to impose arbitrary across-the-board cuts to physicians and other providers that could adversely affect access to health care services for Medicare patients.” Pharmaceutical industry trade group PhRMA echoed the AMA’s views, saying that proposals made by IPAB would be “…likely to restrict patients’ access to needed health care services and treatments by disproportionately targeting new treatments as a way to cut spending—prioritizing cost-cutting ahead of a medicine’s benefits to patients.”
The announcement that the IPAB would not be formed this year came welcome news to the biotechnology industry, which was bracing for the board’s implementation. The 2016 report from the same body projected that 2017 spending levels would trigger the IPAB provision this summer, and many in the industry feared that IPAB’s primary recommendations to reduce Medicare costs would target expensive biologic treatments, forcing biopharmaceutical companies to make substantial price concessions on their products.
Despite broad industry criticism of IPAB, a growing bipartisan push in the House and Senate to repeal the deeply unpopular provision, and Republicans’ promises to repeal and replace the ACA, Senate healthcare reform legislation leaves the IPAB provision untouched. According to the original legislation’s language, Congress would have to pass a joint resolution to repeal the IPAB provision before August 15 of this year. Such a resolution would have to be passed by a three-fifth’s majority in both chambers, and that is an unlikely scenario as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) focuses on gaining enough votes to pass the latest version of the healthcare reform bill.
Even though IPAB will not be be enforcing mandatory cost controls on Medicaid, other deep cuts are on the way. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has proposed a rule, due to be published in the Federal Register on July 20, that would revise the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center payment system for 2018.
The rule would cut the applicable payment rate for separately payable drugs and biologics acquired under the 340B program from the average sales price (ASP) plus 6% to the ASP minus 22.5%. These cuts are part of a CMS effort to curb the growth of spending, which CMS says grew faster among hospitals that participated in the 340B program than among hospitals that did not, noting that Medicare beneficiaries at 340B hospitals were either prescribed more drugs or were prescribed more expensive drugs than were beneficiaries in other hospitals.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.