Nordic countries have had some of the highest rates of biosimilar use, and extensive registry data in these countries also allow for observational studies of biosimilar use in real-world clinical practice. A new study used data from 5 such registries—which included more than 2000 patients with spondyloarthritis—to assess retention rates for those treated with biosimilars or reference products of etanercept and infliximab.
Nordic countries have had some of the highest rates of biosimilar use, and extensive registry data in these countries also allow for observational studies of biosimilar use in real-world clinical practice. A new paper, published in RMD Open, used data from 5 such registries—which included more than 2000 patients with spondyloarthritis—to assess retention rates for those treated with biosimilars or reference products of etanercept and infliximab.
In the study, biologic-naïve patients with spondyloarthritis in the 5 Nordic nations who started treatment with reference etanercept (Enbrel), reference infliximab (Remicade), biosimilar etanercept (Benepali), or biosimilar infliximab (Remsima) between 2014 and 2017 were included. Data were derived from national biologics registers in Sweden (ARTIS), Denmark (DANBIO), Finland (ROB-FIN), and Iceland (ICEBIO), as well as the regional biologics register in Norway (NOR-DMARD).
In total, 2334 patients were included; 1319 patients received infliximab (24% reference, 76% biosimilar), and 1015 patients received etanercept (49% reference, 51% biosimilar). Apart from higher concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use in the reference cohorts, there were no clinically relevant differences in baseline characteristics among the patients who started therapy with reference drugs versus biosimilars.
The investigators found that retention among patient receiving reference and biosimilar drugs was similar at 1 year:
Two-year data were available for infliximab, and also showed similar retention:
Proportional hazard analyses showed a 5% decrease in risk of discontinuation favoring biosimilar infliximab over the reference, and a 15% decrease for biosimilar etanercept over its reference; however, the 95% CIs did not show a statistically significant decrease in risk.
While the study was limited by the fact that it did not allow for a direct comparison of efficacy, and the fact that not all countries contributed to all treatment arms due to biosimilar availability, “a strength of the present study is that confounders, such as nocebo related to the context of switching from a stable ongoing treatment with an originator to its (cheaper) biosimilar, should be minimized in a bionaïve population. Another strength is that the pooling of data from the different countries ought to reduce the risk of country-specific channeling towards originators or biosimilars,” write the authors.
Reference
Lindström U, Glintborg B, Di Giuseppe D, et al. Treatment retention of infliximab and etanercept originators versus their corresponding biosimilars: Nordic collaborative observational study of 2334 biologics naïve patients with spondyloarthritis. RMD Open 2019;5:e001079. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001079.
Study Documents HCPs’ Experiences of a Mandatory Switch to Inform Future Transitions
December 2nd 2023A survey explores the experiences of health care providers (HCP) throughout the transition process following a mandatory switch from the adalimumab originator (Humira) to a biosimilar in New Zealand in 2022.
Dr Fran Gregory Sizes Up the US Adalimumab Market: Will Biosimilars See Success?
September 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Fran Gregory, PharmD, MBA, vice president of emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, analyzes the adalimumab market so far in the United States and provides insight into how the market needs to adapt to accept these products and ensure lower drug costs for patients.
HHS Praises Biosimilars Savings but Opportunities to Reduce Part B Spending Remain
November 28th 2023Although biosimilars have already generated savings for Medicare Part B programs and beneficiaries, opportunities for substantial reductions in spending remain, according to a report from the HHS.
Adalimumab Biosimilars Take Center Stage: A Game Changer for IBD Treatment
July 16th 2023Laura Wingate, from the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation, explains some of the challenges regarding educating patients and providers on biosimilars for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as whether the gastroenterology space is ready for the influx of adalimumab biosimilars.
Study: Biosimilar Use, Dose Rounding Produce More Cost Savings Than Either Strategy Alone
November 18th 2023A retrospective study of New England patients receiving trastuzumab or bevacizumab found that combining dose rounding and biosimilar use resulted in greater cost savings than either strategy alone.