A study from Norway on whether switching stable patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with Remicade® to a biosimilar has revealed that outcomes were no different.
A study from Norway on whether switching stable patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with Remicade® to a biosimilar has revealed that outcomes were no different.
The results of the NOR-SWITCH trial were announced at the United European Gastroenterology Week in Vienna, Austria, on October 18. This investigation was designed to determine how switching to Celltrion’s biosimilar (marketed as Remsima® in Europe and soon to be marketed as Inflectra® in the US) would affect patient status. This 2-year, post marketing study was designed to demonstrate noninferiority (not superiority) of Remsima to Remicade.
The approximately 500 patients entering the trial had to be receiving a stable dose of infliximab for at least 6 months at baseline. In this controlled study, half of the patients were switched to Remsima treatment. The results indicated no clinically meaningful difference in safety or efficacy. Although this trial was not designed to demonstrate the possible effects of switching back to the original product, it does bolster the case that in patients with RA, switching from Remicade to the biosimilar poses little risk.
What of switching these products in patients with other approved indications?
More data are needed to determine the effectiveness and safety of this option. In one study conducted by Celltrion’s marketing partner Pfizer, 3300 patients are being recruited to determine how often patients with inflammatory bowel disease switch from one anti-TNF to another. That study is due to end in June 2019. Will NOR-SWITCH spur US payers to encourage physicians to switch treatments, once Inflectra is launched in late November? It does offer a bit of insulation for proponents, but (1) only for Inflectra/Remsima—Remicade switches in RA not for other indications, and (2) these study results do not apply to other anti-TNFs.
However, Sandoz utilized a multiple-switching study design in one of the studies (Study 302) to support FDA approval of its etanercept biosimilar Erelzi™. In this study of plaque psoriasis, a subgroup of patients were switched between the originator product and Erelzi at weeks 12, 18, and 24, without negative effects.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Eye on Pharma: BI Cyltezo Partnership; Europe Ustekinumab Launch; Mexico Biosimilar Approval
July 24th 2024Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) partners with GoodRx to offer its unbranded adalimumab biosimilar to patients at an exclusive low price; a new ustekinumab biosimilar launches in Europe; and Mexican officials approve a bevacizumab biosimilar.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Real-World Study: No Increase in Health Resource Costs After Infliximab Biosimilar Introduction
July 20th 2024Although biosimilars reduce drug purchasing costs for hospitals, it’s unclear whether those savings might be offset by increased health resource utilization following a non-medical switching initiative.