Novartis announced on Thursday that the FDA has approved a label update for secukinumab (Cosentyx) to include moderate to severe scalp psoriasis, a particularly challenging form of psoriasis to treat, and a condition that affects approximately half of patients with psoriasis.
Novartis announced on Thursday that the FDA has approved a label update for secukinumab (Cosentyx) to include moderate to severe scalp psoriasis, a particularly challenging form of psoriasis to treat, and a condition that Novartis says affects approximately half of patients with psoriasis.
The label update was based on data from the phase 3 SCALP study of secukinumab versus placebo in 102 patients with scalp psoriasis. Patients were randomized to receive either 300 mg of secukinumab or placebo at weeks 0, 1, 2, and 3, and then every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. The proportion of patients who had an Investigator’s Global Assessment scalp-only score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) during the study period were 56.9% for the secukinumab arm and 5.9% for the placebo arm.
Secukinumab was the first interleukin-17A inhibitor FDA-approved to treat moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and the label update, says Eric Hughes, global development unit head of immunology and dermatology at Novartis, “…confirms the additional value Cosentyx offers to patients who seek a treatment effective in various areas of the body…we’re proud to expand treatment possibilities of Cosentyx for an even greater number of patients."
Already this year, Novartis released data from the head-to-head CLARITY study showing that secukinumab outperformed ustekinumab (Stelara) in treating psoriasis, and announced that it is initiating the SURPASS trial, a head-to-head clinical trial of secukinumab versus adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Already recruiting is the EXCEED trial, yet another head-to-head trial of secukinumab versus adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis.
As the originator adalimumab (Humira) moves closer to patent expiry, secukinumab’s growing body of positive data may help it to compete for a substantial share of the inflammatory disease market against an increasing number of US- and EU-approved biosimilars. Already, secukinumab has become a top earner for Novartis, with 2017 sales of $615 million across all indications—up 53% from 2016—according to Novartis’ 2017 financial report.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.