Korean drug maker Celltrion says that the FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) will convene to discuss the Biologics License Application (BLA) for CT-P10, a proposed biosimilar rituximab, on October 10, 2018. CT-P10 is already authorized in the European Union, where it was approved under the trade names Rituzena, Ritemvia, Truxima, and Blitzima.
Korean drug maker Celltrion says that the FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) will convene to discuss the Biologics License Application (BLA) for CT-P10, a proposed biosimilar rituximab, on October 10, 2018. CT-P10 is already authorized in the European Union, where it was approved under the trade names Rituzena, Ritemvia, Truxima, and Blitzima.
“We are fully committed to preparing for this advisory committee meeting and look forward to the discussion about CT-P10,” Woosung Kee, CEO of Celltrion, said in a statement announcing the committee’s meeting. “The development of biosimilars is of great importance in the field of oncology, and has the potential to enrich our therapeutic arsenal and to increase accessibility to therapies for patients at an affordable price.”
Click to read more about CT-P10.
Announcement of the ODAC meeting is a step forward for the drug maker in the United States. Celltrion received a Complete Response Letter (CRL) from the FDA with respect to its rituximab BLA—along with a CRL related to the BLA for a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar—in April of this year. At the time, the company said that the FDA had requested additional information about both products. It also sought to reassure investors that it was taking steps to address concerns that led the FDA to issue a Form 483 to Celltrion over its manufacturing practices.
The last occasion on which the ODAC convened for a discussion of anticancer biosimilars was July 2017, when the committee discussed Amgen’s bevacizumab product, later approved as Mvasi, and Biocon’s trastuzumab product, later approved as Ogivri. On that occasion, the committee voted unanimously in favor of approval of both products, and for the extrapolation of all indications of the originator products.
The discussion of extrapolation is likely to be of particular interest in the case of CT-P10; rituximab is used to treat both malignant and non-malignant indications. While the biosimilar has been studied in patients with follicular lymphoma and the ODAC will review the BLA for the product, the biosimilar has also been studied in a phase 3 trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study in RA revealed that CT-P10 were equivalent in terms of efficacy and had similar pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, and safety profiles up to week 24.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
BioRationality: Removing the Misconceptions Surrounding Interchangeability
April 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, outlines the current state of interchangeable biosimilars in the US and policy changes needed to clear up misconceptions surrounding the meaning behind interchangeability designations.