House Bill 4005 requires drug manufacturers to compile a report on a prescription drug if the price was $100 or more for a 1-month supply (or course of treatment lasting less than 1 month) and if the net price increased by 10% or more.
Earlier this week, Oregon Governor Kate Brown, D, signed a bill that looks to provide more transparency around drug pricing.
House Bill 4005 requires drug manufacturers to compile a report on a prescription drug if the price was $100 or more for a 1-month supply (or course of treatment lasting less than 1 month) and if the net price increased by 10% or more.
For drugs that fit into these criteria, manufacturers would need to provide information to explain the factors that contributed to the price increase, such as:
Under the law, pharmaceutical companies must provide these reports by July 2019.
In addition, the bill creates a drug pricing task force and mandates that Oregon’s Department of Consumer and Business Services post a list of high drug price increases. Furthermore, the bill also requires that insurers show how these drug prices affect premiums.
“Every Oregonian should be able to access the medications and treatments that allow them to live healthy, productive lives. This bill brings greater transparency around drug pricing, an important step towards making life-saving and essential drugs more affordable,” said Governor Brown in a statement.
As soon as the bill was signed, the pharmaceutical industry responded.
“[The law] will have a chilling effect on an innovative industry and do nothing to empower patients or lower their prescription drug costs,” said Biotechnology Innovation Organization’s CEO, Jim Greenwood, in a statement.
According to the National Academy for State Health Policy, state legislatures are currently considering 78 bills to regulate pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), 48 that focus on drug pricing transparency, 11 that address so-called "price-gouging" and more on a variety of other topics, including the importation of drugs.
The proposed bills have received pushback from the industry, with pharmaceutical companies sending lobbyists to state governments around the country, according to Kaiser Health News.
Other states, including Louisiana, Nevada, Maryland, North Carolina, and Vermont have also passed measures that aim to increase transparency in drug pricing.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Hesitancy in MENA Nations to Adopt WHO Biosimilar Guidelines Hinders Market Development
July 17th 2024The World Health Organization’s (WHO) new guidelines for biosimilar approvals aim to save time and money for manufacturers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but hesitancy among nations to adopt the guidelines is stifling market development of biosimilars.
BioRationality: Time to Get Rid of PBMs if Biosimilars Are to Succeed
July 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, discusses the challenges with pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that plague the biosimilar industry and new legislation that attempts to reform their practices and encourage biosimilar adoption.