While it is well understood that timely access to treatment is key for the management of rheumatic diseases, respondents to The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 Rheumatic Disease Patient Survey reported difficulty accessing and paying for their therapies in the past year.
While it is well understood that timely access to treatment is key for the management of rheumatic diseases, respondents to The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 Rheumatic Disease Patient Survey reported difficulty accessing and paying for their therapies in the past year.
The survey, which was conducted online in June of 2019 among a nationally representative sample of 1517 adults with rheumatic disease, sheds additional light on findings from last year’s 2018 Rheumatic Disease Report Card, which graded individual US states on patients’ ability to live well with rheumatic disease.
One key finding of this year’s survey is that step therapy is being widely employed as a utilization management tool. Step therapy is a strategy under which which less expensive drugs must be administered and found to be ineffective before a patient gains access to higher-cost drugs, often including biologics and their biosimilars. In total, 46.49% of patients said they had been required to undergo step therapy in the past year. Patients in Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania were more likely to be subject to step therapy than those who lived elsewhere, and approximately half of all men receiving treatment were required to undergo step therapy.
These findings concerning step therapy are particularly notable given that, starting this year, CMS implemented a change allowing Medicare Advantage plans to use step therapy for Part B drugs. According to the ACR in a statement issued earlier this year, “Step therapy has resulted in forced drug switching, treatment gaps, and cessation of effective therapy.” Downstream effects, the group added, include uncontrolled disease, disability, and increased healthcare costs.
The cost of care was indeed a key issue for respondents in this year’s survey; 57.13% of patients said they had difficulty affording their therapy in the past year. Affordability concerns were not limited to the uninsured; while 90.16% of patients were insured, 56.98% of patients with insurance said they had difficulty affording their treatments. In total, 25.10% of patients reported that their out-of-pocket spending was higher than $1000, and 6.24% said their spending exceeded $5000 each year. Among those who had insurance, 23.76% paid more than $1000 out of pocket for their medication every year.
Additionally, 57.41% of patients said they were being seen by or had been referred to a rheumatologist, but 63.68% had to wait more than 30 days to receive an initial appointment, and 39.58% had to wait between 31 days and 60 days.
“These findings make clear that Americans living with rheumatic disease—regardless of age, gender, or income level—struggle to find affordable care," said Paula Marchetta, MD, MBA, president of the ACR. “To address these challenges, it is crucial for patients, clinicians, and policymakers to work together to improve access to rheumatology care so that patients can live longer, healthier, and more fulfilling lives.”
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Switching Patterns Highlight Nocebo Effect in European Patients Using Amgevita
July 23rd 2024About half of the patients in a European study who transitioned from reference adalimumab to a biosimilar version stayed on the biosimilar at the 1-year mark. However, researchers warned about a possible nocebo effect resulting in some patients switching back to the originator.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Real-World Study: No Increase in Health Resource Costs After Infliximab Biosimilar Introduction
July 20th 2024Although biosimilars reduce drug purchasing costs for hospitals, it’s unclear whether those savings might be offset by increased health resource utilization following a non-medical switching initiative.