Patients may save money on prescriptions---and cut down pharma's profits.
The long awaited news conference from then President-Elect Trump in early January didn't disappoint in terms of drama, nor bode well for the country's most well-known and financially-lucrative pharmaceutical companies.
Only Merck remained unscathed among the top-tier drug manufacturers in the Dow--stock was up 2.6%. Merck was the Dow's best performer in the sector, due to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) acceptance of a bid for an accelerated review of an immune-system drug to be used with chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer patients.
Today via NPR, Mr. Trump inferred that many drugs are manufactured outside the US, and that , "A lot of industries are going to be coming back. We have to get our drug industry coming back. Our drug industry has been disastrous. They’re leaving left and right. They supply our drugs, but they don't make them here. To a large extent. And the other thing we have to do is create a new bidding procedures for the drug industry because they're getting away with murder."
"Pharma has a lot of lobbies, a lot of lobbyists and a lot of power. And there's very little bidding on drugs. We’re the largest buyer of drugs in the world, and yet we don't bid properly. And were going to start bidding and were going to save billions of dollars over a period of time", stated Trump.
Does this mean Medicare will negotiate drug prices in the future?
With more people entering the Medicare system over the next eight years, this will be more than just a radical shift in a federal program that is already financially burdened beyond its capacity. Medicare is the largest buyer of drugs in the US, and that means all private insurance companies that participate in the Medicare marketplace will be able to negotiate prices with the drug companies. Estimates are the federal government could save as much as $16 billion annually by negotiating prices directly--which is way below the $300 billion figure mentioned by Trump when he was a candidate.
All pharmaceutical stakeholders will be impacted -- but can Medicare give a price ultimatum that drug companies must take? We don't know yet. Trump has said that pharmaceutical organizations have a responsibility to the public, even though they are privately-owned entities. The end result will hopefully be a compromise.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Eye on Pharma: BI Cyltezo Partnership; Europe Ustekinumab Launch; Mexico Biosimilar Approval
July 24th 2024Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) partners with GoodRx to offer its unbranded adalimumab biosimilar to patients at an exclusive low price; a new ustekinumab biosimilar launches in Europe; and Mexican officials approve a bevacizumab biosimilar.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Real-World Study: No Increase in Health Resource Costs After Infliximab Biosimilar Introduction
July 20th 2024Although biosimilars reduce drug purchasing costs for hospitals, it’s unclear whether those savings might be offset by increased health resource utilization following a non-medical switching initiative.