A real-world analysis from Japan confirmed that CT-P13, an intravenous infliximab biosimilar, had comparable safety and efficacy to the reference product (Remicade; infliximab) in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.
A real-world study found that CT-P13 (Remsima, Inflectra), Celltrion’s intravenous infliximab biosimilar, is just as safe and effective as the originator (Remicade; reference infliximab) for people with immune-related inflammatory diseases.
The Japanese analysis, published in Drug Safety, reviewed data from 3 prospective post-marketing surveillance (PMS) studies conducted in patients who were biologic-naïve and those who were switched from the originator to the biosimilar. The study provided valuable long-term data on the safety and efficacy of biosimilar CT-P13 and identify risk factors for frequent adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which can help providers with clinical decision-making.
Researchers pooled data from studies assessing CT-P13 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and psoriasis. Patients with RA received the first dose of CT-P13 between January 2015 and November 2020, with a surveillance period of 1 year. Patients with CD or UC started CT-P13 therapy between January 2015 and April 2018, with a 2-year follow-up period. The study on psoriasis enrolled patients from May 2015 to January 2020 and had a 1-year follow-up period. All 3 studies were conducted by Nippon Kayaku after CT-P13 was approved in Japan.
During the present analysis, the patients were categorized into 3 categories: biologic-naïve patients, patients switching from originator infliximab to CT-P13, and patients switching to CT-P13 from another biologic for medical reasons (adverse events or inadequate response).
Overall, 1816 patients (RA: n = 987, 54%; CD: n = 342, 19%; UC: n = 322, 18%; psoriasis: n = 165, 9%) were evaluated for CT-P13 safety, and 1150 patients who had pre-treatment and post-treatment data for disease activity parameters were assessed for efficacy. Of those patients, 735 (40%) were biologic-naïve, 894 (49%) switched from originator infliximab to CT-P13, and 197 (11%) switched to CT-P13 from another biologic.
In the safety analysis, adverse reactions were reported in 24.2% of all patients (biologic-naïve: 30.5%; originator to CT-P13: 17.0%; other biologic to CT-P13: 33.5%). Infusion reactions were the most common adverse reaction (8.2%), and the incidence was highest in patients with UC and those with an allergy history. Infection was the second most common reaction (6.1%); however, tuberculosis only occurred in 4 (0.2%) patients.
Infection incidence was low in the CD and psoriasis cohorts, and the significant risk factors were allergy history, comorbidities, and concomitant steroid use. Sixteen (0.4%) patients experienced interstitial lung disease, including 11 patients with RA.
In the efficacy analysis, CT-P13 therapy resulted in similar decreases in disease activity parameters across all 4 diseases. Treatment discontinuation varied by disease. Discontinuations due to efficacy issues were most common in UC and psoriasis (19% for both). Adverse reactions as the reason for discontinuation were higher among patients with UC (14%). Sixty-four (4%) patients who switched from the originator switched back.
Additionally, disease activity parameters decreased quickly and the proportion of patients in remission increased in naïve patients. Those who switched from the originator maintained lowered parameter levels that were achieved prior to switching. Decreases observed in patients who switched from another biologic were found, but they were mostly because of insufficient efficacy, suggesting that the patients did not respond to infliximab therapy generally rather than complications with the biosimilar.
The analysis had some limitations. Patient data varies due to different diseases, and the use of previously reported data for comparisons in single-arm post-marketing studies makes the results less conclusive. Real-world post-marketing data is scarcer than clinical trial data, but it still provides valuable insights into real clinical practice.
The authors concluded, “as a cost-effective biosimilar, CT-P13 could be useful for the treatment of immune-mediate inflammatory diseases in biologic-naïve patients and switched patients from biologics.”
Reference
Takeuchi T, Nishikawa K, Yamada F, et al. Real‐world safety and efficacy of biosimilar CT‐P13 in patients with immune‐mediated inflammatory diseases: Integrated analysis of three Japanese prospective observational studies. Drug Saf. 2023;46:991-1005. doi:10.1007/s40264-023-01340-1
Switching From Originator Etanercept to Biosimilar Version Proves Safe, Effective in RA
September 5th 2024Patients with rheumatoid arthritis who switched from the etanercept originator to a biosimilar exhibited similar disease activity and drug persistence compared with those who remained on the originator, indicating that nonmedical switching does not negatively impact treatment outcomes.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for May 2024—Podcast Edition
June 2nd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review the biggest gastroenterology biosimilar stories from May 2024, covering new data from conferences and journals on infliximab and adalimumab products that demonstrate positive clinical results and confirm the safety of these biosimilars, as well as the feasibility of switching to them.
CMS Announces New Drug Prices Under the IRA, Including for Stelara and Enbrel
August 19th 2024CMS announced negotiated prices for 10 drugs under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), sparking mixed reactions, with concerns that including drugs facing imminent biosimilar competition could hinder market access to lower-cost alternatives.
No Differences in Long-Term Drug Survival Between Biosimilar, Originator TNF Inhibitors
August 15th 2024An analysis of subcutaneous biosimilar and originator tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for rheumatic diseases found no significant differences in survival or discontinuation rates due to inefficacy or adverse events, with biosimilars showing lower overall discontinuation rates and higher retention rates.