Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a prevalent, vision-threatening disease, of which macular edema is a common complication. Standard treatment for RVO-associated macular edema involves intravitreal treatment with anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents such as ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or aflibercept. Despite success with these agents in clinical trials, anti-VEGF agents may be administered less frequently in clinical practice than in studies.
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a prevalent, vision-threatening disease, of which macular edema is a common complication. Standard treatment for RVO-associated macular edema involves intravitreal treatment with anti—vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents such as ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or aflibercept. Despite success with these agents in clinical trials, anti-VEGF agents may be administered less frequently in clinical practice than in studies.
Researchers sought to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and injection frequency of anti-VEGF drugs in treating macular edema secondary to RVO in clinical practice, and used a multicenter, retrospective, open-label chart review of 165 patients 18 years and older who received at least 3 intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF from August 2013 to September 2014.
A total of 117 patients had 1 year or more of follow-up after anti-VEGF treatment, and 40 (24.2%) continued to receive anti-VEGF injections and had data available through year 2. Seventeen (10.3%) continued therapy and had data available through year 3.
A total of 1641 anti-VEGF injections were administered, 842 (51.3%) of which were ranibizumab, 724 (41.1%) of which were bevacizumab, and 75 (4.6%) of which were aflibercept. Most patients received repeated injections of 1 agent, but 33.3% (n = 55) of patients switched agents at least 1 time during the study period.
In controlled clinical trials conducted for its approval, ranibizumab was administered monthly for 6 months and as needed through 1 year. By contrast, in this study, patients received a mean of 7.1 (range, 1-15) anti-VEGF injections in year 1, 5.4 (range, 1-13) in year 2, and 5.9 (range, 1-11) in year 3. The mean interval between injections ranged from 1.1 to 1.6 months across the first 16 injections.
The primary end point of combined visual and anatomic response (measured as best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better and central retinal thickness of 250 mcm or less on time-domain optical coherence tomography or 300 mcm or less on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at the same visit) was achieved by just 20.0% to 36.7% of patients after the first 16 injections.
“In this real-world study, a mean of [5] to [7] anti-VEGF injections was administered yearly, and the response to anti-VEGF therapy was suboptimal in many patients,” write the authors. “More frequent injections may improve outcomes, but some patients do not achieve a dry macula even with monthly injections.”
Reference
Jumper JM, Dugel PU, Chen S, Blinder KJ, Walt JG. Anti-VEGF treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion: patterns of use and effectiveness in clinical practice (ECHO study report 2). Clin Ophtalmol. 2018;12:621-629. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S163859.
Physician and Patient Perspectives After Starting or Switching to Amgevita in IBD
March 23rd 2024A real-world study surveying physicians and patients on adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) found both patients initiating ABP 501 and those who had switched from the reference product had higher satisfaction levels.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
The Role of Biosimilars: Advancing Access, Financial Health, and System Sustainability
March 11th 2024Kashyap Patel, MD, CEO of Carolina Blood and Cancer Care, a member of the Community Oncology Alliance, and member of The Center for Biosimilars® Advisory Board, glances back at the development of the biosimilar industry and the last 5 years of progress.
Pipelines and Preparation: How the US Can Prepare for More RA Biosimilars
April 16th 2023What can practices do to prepare for all the biosimilars to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) coming down the pipeline? And how can they ensure that the lower-than-anticipated adoption rates for infliximab biosimilars are not repeated? Robert Zutaut, RPh, from McKesson Provider Solutions, tackles all this and more on this episode of Not So Different.
Cardinal Health Report Showcases Biosimilar Growth, Provider and Payer Evolution, and More
February 29th 2024In its annual biosimilars report, Cardinal Health provided updates on how provider acceptance growth, evolving payer dynamics, and the growing pipeline for biosimilars will shape the biosimilar landscape over the next 5 years.
Biosimilar Substitution Within OCM Could Result in Lower Total Cost of Care
February 16th 2024Researchers found that the total cost of care per oncology episode was significantly lowered when biosimilar substitution was implemented in Medicare’s Oncology Care Model (OCM), suggesting that biosimilar uptake can serve as a critical tool to mitigate risk and improve financial performance for providers.