A recent study presented at EULAR found that a substantial number of patients who switched treatment from reference etanercept to a biosimilar switched back to the reference after a short period.
A recent study, sponsored by Pfizer and presented in a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) poster session earlier this month, found that a substantial number of patients who had switched treatment from reference etanercept to a biosimilar treatment switched back to the reference product after a short time.
The study’s authors sought to describe the position of the reference etanercept treatment within the Swedish biologics market for rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, before and after the launch of a biosimilar product.
The market share for each product was tracked using prescription data from the Swedish Prescription Registry (which covers 100% of prescriptions written in Sweden) for each month during the period between November 2015 and October 2016. The researchers tracked the switching dynamics of patients initiating the biosimilar treatment between April 2016 and October 2016, and measured the proportion of patients naïve to biologic treatment as well as the proportion of patients who had been treated with etanercept, adalimumab, and other biologic agents in the 12 months prior to initiating treatment with biosimilar etanercept.
The researchers found that, in the first 6 months after biosimilar etanercept was launched in the Swedish market, the market share of reference etanercept decreased from 40% to 31%. A total of 2439 patients were found to have initiated treatment with biosimilar etanercept, and of this group, 40.1% were naïve to biologic treatments, 48.3% had previously been treated with reference etanercept, 4.4% had been previously treated with adalimumab, and 7.2% had been previously treated with other biologics.
Among the group of patients who initiated biosimilar etanercept after having previously received its reference, 7% switched back to the reference after an average period of 43 days. Of the group who had previously received adalimumab, 6% switched back to treatment with adalimumab after an average of 57 days.
The researchers concluded that a switch from reference products to cheaper biosimilars is very likely to be a result of economic factors, however, the reasons for patients’ switching back to reference products is not clear. The researchers posit patient preference and clinical factors as possible reasons for such a return, but they state that longer-term studies will be necessary in order to confirm these preliminary findings.
The results of this study echo those of a previous study, also funded by Pfizer and conducted in Germany by the same research group, which found that 10% of patients who switched to biosimilar etanercept returned to treatment with its reference within 3 months. In the German study, 72% of patients who switched back to reference products returned to the same administration method they had used previously, suggesting that device type may have played a role.
As health systems contend with high prescription drug costs and patients find themselves with questions and concerns about switching, other European nations are turning to education programs to help keep patients on lower-cost biosimilars, though it remains to be seen whether such programs can prevent patients from switching back to reference products in the longer term.
Real-World Data Confirm Safety of Switching Between Ranibizumab Biosimilars
March 19th 2025Patients with diabetic macular edema previously treated with a ranibizumab biosimilar in India experience comparable safety and efficacy after being switched to another ranibizumab biosimilar, demonstrating real-world safety of biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Comparable Pregnancy and Infant Milestones With Infliximab Biosimilars vs Originator in IBD
March 15th 2025A study evaluating pregnancy outcomes and infant developmental milestones found similar outcomes between pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who received reference infliximab and those who received a biosimilar.