Robert Cerwinski, JD, partner at Goodwin, explains the differences between European and US patent challenges for biologics.
Transcript:
Have biosimilars faced legal complexities in Europe similar to those in the United States?
The short answer is: not as much. The principal reason why, is in the European Patent Office, the EPO, there has been a very robust opposition proceeding for many years. What this has allowed is for biosimilar applicants to challenge patents that stand in the way of marketing a biosimilar early and effectively. We see now with IPRs (inter partes reviews) and PGRs (post-grant reviews) in the US, we see something akin to the European Patent Office (EPO) style oppositions, but IPRs and PGRs are quite a bit different. Arguably, it’s not as efficient of a mechanism. By the time the EMA approves a biosimilar, the biosimilar applicant has a number of years to use this very robust opposition proceeding in the EPO to try to clear patents away. So, it’s been easier for biosimilar applicants in Europe to actually reach market.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.