Roche Holding AG has reached a confidential US patent settlement with Pfizer regarding its brand-name rituximab (Rituxan).
A recent research update from Morgan Stanley notes that Roche Holding AG has reached a confidential US patent settlement with Pfizer on the French company’s 8,329,172 patent for brand-name rituximab (Rituxan).
The analysts (one who covers Pfizer and one who covers Roche’s partner Biogen) note that biosimilar competition to Roche’s 3 largest biologics—Rituxan, Herceptin, and Avastin—jeopardizes 36% of Roche profits, but they write that Roche’s strong history of patent defense will continue to forestall biosimilar competition.
They note that Roche has successfully defended 7 patents through the inter partes review process to the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The company’s patent estate, consisting of 37 patents, and associated litigation will postpone biosimilars until January 2021, they say.
Late last year, the FDA approved CT-P10, a biosimilar referencing Rituxan, which will be sold under the name Truxima by Celltrion and Teva for oncology indications only—a so-called “skinny label.” Roche retains patent exclusivity on some indications; Morgan Stanly said those patents protect 26% of Rituxan’s sales through July 2020, another 20% of sales to April 2018, and another 14% of sales to November 2029.
Pfizer is also hoping for an FDA approval of PF-05280586, a proposed rituximab biosimilar, in the third quarter of this year.
As Rituxan faces more competition, particularly in Europe, Roche is looking more to emicizumab (Hemlibra) for patients with hemophilia A with or without factor VIII inhibitors; ocrelizumab (Ocrevus), an anti-inflammatory drug that is a so-called “biobetter”of rituximab; and the innovator anti—programmed cell death-ligand 1 biologic atezolizumab (Tecentriq) to drive sales.
Formulary management practices in the United States—for example, should they begin to shift more rapidly in favor of less expensive biosimilars—would affect the outlook for Roche, the reports says.
In addition, plans by the Trump administration to implement reform in Medicare Part B “leads to price risk of 13% of the business franchise.” The administration wants to shift some Part B coverage to Part D as part of its plan to reduce total drug spending.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
BioRationality: Removing the Misconceptions Surrounding Interchangeability
April 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, outlines the current state of interchangeable biosimilars in the US and policy changes needed to clear up misconceptions surrounding the meaning behind interchangeability designations.
Sintilimab, Bevacizumab Biosimilar, HAIC Improves Survival in Patients With Unresectable HCC
April 14th 2024Positive results of sintilimab, IBI305, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) treatment showed shrinking tumors and previously converting inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to resectable HCC with manageable adverse effects.