Roche Holding AG has reached a confidential US patent settlement with Pfizer regarding its brand-name rituximab (Rituxan).
A recent research update from Morgan Stanley notes that Roche Holding AG has reached a confidential US patent settlement with Pfizer on the French company’s 8,329,172 patent for brand-name rituximab (Rituxan).
The analysts (one who covers Pfizer and one who covers Roche’s partner Biogen) note that biosimilar competition to Roche’s 3 largest biologics—Rituxan, Herceptin, and Avastin—jeopardizes 36% of Roche profits, but they write that Roche’s strong history of patent defense will continue to forestall biosimilar competition.
They note that Roche has successfully defended 7 patents through the inter partes review process to the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The company’s patent estate, consisting of 37 patents, and associated litigation will postpone biosimilars until January 2021, they say.
Late last year, the FDA approved CT-P10, a biosimilar referencing Rituxan, which will be sold under the name Truxima by Celltrion and Teva for oncology indications only—a so-called “skinny label.” Roche retains patent exclusivity on some indications; Morgan Stanly said those patents protect 26% of Rituxan’s sales through July 2020, another 20% of sales to April 2018, and another 14% of sales to November 2029.
Pfizer is also hoping for an FDA approval of PF-05280586, a proposed rituximab biosimilar, in the third quarter of this year.
As Rituxan faces more competition, particularly in Europe, Roche is looking more to emicizumab (Hemlibra) for patients with hemophilia A with or without factor VIII inhibitors; ocrelizumab (Ocrevus), an anti-inflammatory drug that is a so-called “biobetter”of rituximab; and the innovator anti—programmed cell death-ligand 1 biologic atezolizumab (Tecentriq) to drive sales.
Formulary management practices in the United States—for example, should they begin to shift more rapidly in favor of less expensive biosimilars—would affect the outlook for Roche, the reports says.
In addition, plans by the Trump administration to implement reform in Medicare Part B “leads to price risk of 13% of the business franchise.” The administration wants to shift some Part B coverage to Part D as part of its plan to reduce total drug spending.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
FDA's Expanded Access: From Laetrile to Right to Try, Ethical Debates Over Early Drug Access
April 28th 2025Christopher T. Robertson, JD, PhD, reviewed the history and ethical landscape of providing access to drugs before FDA approval, highlighting the crucial role of clinical trials and ethical safeguards at the 2025 Festival of Biologics USA.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Addressing Patent Abuse, Reimbursement Models Key to Sustainable Biosimilar Market
April 25th 2025Sonia T. Oskouei, PharmD, emphasized strategies to streamline regulations and evolve to overcome barriers and expand the availability of cost-effective biosimilar treatments across more therapeutic areas.