Seth Ginsberg, co-founder and president of the Global Healthy Living Foundation, explains how "fail-first" policies, or step therapy, affect patients.
Transcript:
What are fail-first policies, and how do they affect patients?
“Fail first” is a term often used to describe a health insurance utilization management strategy called step therapy. Step therapy is a program put into place by a patient’s health insurance provider. It encourages the use of less costly yet effective medications before more costly medications are approved for coverage. In some specific instances, step therapy can be an appropriate way to reduce cost, however when applied to more complex diseases and conditions, it can be unethical, prolong suffering, exacerbate disease, and increase cost.
Most of the time, the problem with step therapy is that it unilaterally applies a one-size fits all policy to individual patients without regard to their specific medical history. A doctor may have prescribed a more expensive, more complex medication—like a biologic—to her patient for specific reasons. For an insurance company to reject the prescription and require a patient to try something different, first, is problematic, to say the least. For example, in many cases, a patient may have already tried the less expensive medication and either not responded to it or experienced an adverse event. But if they are new to their health insurance plan, that history may be disregarded. This puts the health of the person at risk by delaying and/or preventing effective treatment. State legislatures across the country as well as Congress are addressing this issue by reforming the appeals process to bypass a step therapy procedure or accelerate an appeal. Legislation provides specific criteria with which a physician can use justify an appeal and puts in place response time requirements that insurers must comply with when answering appeal submissions from patients and providers.
Fail-first policies intrude on the patient/physician relationship and lead to:
Our organization has been a leader in helping people understand fail-first practices, educating policy makers and regulators about fail-first practices, and keeping the public updated on each state’s approach to fail first. The web site for that information is www.FailFirstHurts.org.
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.