Some industry groups have begun voicing their concerns that proposed tariffs could have a negative effect on the production of generics and biosimilars, and may increase the cost of these products.
Recently, President Donald Trump proposed tariffs on thousands of Chinese-manufactured products. According to the list produced by the United States Trade Representative (UTSR), which comprises more than 1300 Chinese products worth about $50 billion each year, some of these products are key ingredients used by drug makers.
A tariff of 25% would be placed on products from the automobile, aerospace, and information technology sphere, as well as the raw ingredients for drugs such as insulin, epinephrine, antibiotics, vaccines, and immunological products as well as some medical devices.
Some industry groups have begun voicing their concerns that these tariffs could have a negative effect on the production of generics and biosimilars, and may increase the cost of these products.
“We are assessing the proposed tariff list of pharmaceutical ingredients and products by the USTR and its possible impact on manufacturing costs for affordable, FDA-approved generic and biosimilar medicines. We are concerned that the proposed tariffs may lead to increased costs of manufacturing for generics and biosimilars and thus high prescription drug prices for patients in the United States,” said Jeffrey K. Francer, senior vice president and general counsel for the Association for Accessible Medicines (AAM) in a statement.
“In 2016, our member companies produced over 61 billion doses of generic and biosimilar medicines in the United States. AAM will maintain a dialogue with USTR to ensure continued patient access to generic and biosimilar medicines,” added Francer.
More than 80% of the ingredients used in the production of drugs prescribed to patients in the United States are produced outside of the country, according to the FDA. In fact, China, together with India, accounts for the production of so many ingredients that the FDA has referred to China as, “a major provider” of these key products.
In a recent interview, Novartis’ CEO, Vasant Narasimhan, MD, also voiced his concern. “I think it would only damage the global economy and obviously impact companies like us—we have manufacturing sites around the world, including in China and the United States. And we need to be able to run our global supply chains in a stable way.”
The Trump administration is requesting public comment on the USTR list until May 11, 2018, and will hold a public hearing on May 15 in Washington, DC.
Following the hearing, companies will have until May 22, 2018, to file any rebuttals.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Hesitancy in MENA Nations to Adopt WHO Biosimilar Guidelines Hinders Market Development
July 17th 2024The World Health Organization’s (WHO) new guidelines for biosimilar approvals aim to save time and money for manufacturers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but hesitancy among nations to adopt the guidelines is stifling market development of biosimilars.
BioRationality: Time to Get Rid of PBMs if Biosimilars Are to Succeed
July 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, discusses the challenges with pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that plague the biosimilar industry and new legislation that attempts to reform their practices and encourage biosimilar adoption.