Filgrastim, used to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients undergoing chemotherapy, is the first drug in the United States to have a biosimilar approved. While the biosimilar filgrastim was approved in 2015, few studies have compared the real-world incidence of FN, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among US patients using the reference product (Neupogen) and those using the approved biosimilar (Zarxio).
Filgrastim, used to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients undergoing chemotherapy, is the first drug in the United States to have a biosimilar approved. Since its 2015 approval, few studies have compared the real-world incidence of FN, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among US patients using the reference product (Neupogen) and among those using the approved biosimilar (Zarxio).
A new study, published in the Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, reports on a retrospective claims analysis of patients with nonmyeloid cancer who were enrolled in commercial or Medicare Advantage plans between 2015 and 2016, and who received either the reference or the biosimilar filgrastim during their first observed chemotherapy cycle.
The research team, led by Lee Schwartzberg, MD, used the Optum Research Database to identify patients 18 years or older who had at least 1 claim for filgrastim following the first cycle of chemotherapy. A total of 3542 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 172 received the biosimilar and 3370 received the reference filgrastim. Weighted cohorts were created using inverse probability of treatment weighting to arrive at a 162-patient biosimilar cohort and a 3297-patient reference cohort.
The researchers found that the incidence of FN between the weighted treatment cohorts was statistically equivalent (90% CI of the difference of percentages was within ±6%), as well as the following:
With respect to costs, the researchers found the following:
Considering the high cost of FN and the potential for prophylaxis with filgrastim to save on costs, say the authors, underutilization of the reference and biosimilar filgrastim has serious consequences in terms of healthcare costs.
“Given that [the biosimilar] is less costly than [the reference]…increasing use of the biosimilar has the potential to promote guideline compliance by improving drug access,” write the authors. “This scenario has already been borne out in Europe, where burgeoning acceptance of biosimilar filgrastim since its 2008 approval has led to more widespread use of prophylaxis, suggesting that health care providers are more able and/or willing to follow clinical guidelines now that the biosimilar is available.”
Reference
Schartzberg LS, Lal LS, Balu S, et al. Clinical outcomes of treatment with filgrastim versus a filgrastim biosimilar and febrile neutropenia—associated costs among patients with nonmyeloid cancer undergoing chemotherapy [published online April 24, 2018]. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17447.
Sandoz Report: A Unified Approach to Overcoming Drug Shortages
October 10th 2024A report from Sandoz emphasizes the need for collaboration among stakeholders to eliminate drug shortages impacting over 90% of hospital systems in the US, recommending policy changes and actions to address the ongoing issue, which has caused treatment delays and increased costs.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
AAM Report: Despite Massive Savings, Patient OOP Costs on Biosimilars, Generics Remain High, Part 2
September 24th 2024Part 2 of our series diving into the Association for Accessible Medicines' (AAM) latest report discusses that while generics and biosimilars saved $445 billion in 2023, their potential is hindered by high patient costs, drug shortages, and ineffective policies, underscoring the need for reforms to fully realize their benefits.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Expanding Biosimilar Adoption: Insights and Strategies With Dr Sophia Humphreys
September 16th 2024Sophia Humphreys, PharmD, MHA, BCBBS, director of system formulary management at Sutter Health, discusses the challenges of expanding biosimilars into new therapeutic areas and highlights the role of education, competitive pricing, and integrated delivery networks in improving adoption and market growth.
Real-World Study Shows Comparable Outcomes Between CT-P13, Remicade in RA
September 14th 2024A real-world study of the biosimilar infliximab-dyyb (CT-P13; Inflectra) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) reported the majority of patients who initiated CT-P13 switched from the reference product (Remicade) or another biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug.