Low levels of competition among drug makers can lead to product shortages and increased generic drug prices, and a recently published study in Global Health suggests that mergers and acquisitions, which reduce the number of players in the pharmaceutical field, should be closely monitored by regulatory authorities.
Low levels of competition among drug makers can lead to product shortages and increased generic drug prices, and a recently published article in Global Health suggests that mergers and acquisitions, which reduce the number of players in the pharmaceutical field, should be closely monitored by regulatory authorities.
The study’s authors assessed data on completed merger and acquisition deals from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2016 in which a generic or biosimilar developer was taken over by an innovator developer. Data on mergers and acquisitions were derived from Bloomberg Finance L.P.
The final study sample consisted of 345 deals, totaling $160.30 billion in value (not adjusted for inflation). In 1995, the total value of such mergers was “negligible,” said the authors, but the value of these transactions grew sharply in 2015 and 2016, reaching an annual value of $44.01 billion in 2016.
“Our results suggest that there is a substantial movement in the last [2] years in the generic sector towards using merger and acquisition deals to grow rather than traditional greenfield investments,” the authors note, saying that, since 2011, 3 mergers were announced at values over $10 billion each.
The paper states that mergers and acquisitions are on the upswing because of the following factors:
These shifts in the competitive landscape signal a change in the economic structures of the generics and biosimilars sector, say the authors. In order to ensure protection against unwarranted price increases or drug shortages, “Antitrust authorities should scrutinize current practices, public drug plans should consider modifying their procurement process to ensure the safety of drug supply, and governments could also explore the possibility of establishing public generic manufacturers,” the authors conclude.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.