Biosimilar filgrastim is used to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, but there exist only limited observational data concerning the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatments in patients who have non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, including sub-types such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Biosimilar filgrastim is used to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN), but observational data are limited on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatments in patients who have non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, including sub-types such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
A recent pan-European, multi-center, prospective, observational study, the results of which were published in a June 2017 issue supplement of Hematological Oncology, examined the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients who received biosimilar filgrastim to prevent CIN and FN, and to describe outcomes for patients who have DLBCL.
The study cohort included a total of 245 patients who had either stage 3 (42%) or stage 4 (58%) DLBCL. The patients received up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy. The results of the study were as follows:
Among adverse events (AEs), patients most frequently reported bone pain (2.9%, n = 7), arthralgia (0.8%, n = 2), and back pain (.08%, n = 2). Other AEs, each reported by 0.4% of patients (n = 1), included increased blood alkaline phosphate, constipation, acute hepatitis, musculoskeletal pain, and pyrexia.
The researchers concluded that the biosimilar filgrastim’s efficacy and safety in real-life practice in patients with DLBCL was similar to that of the reference filgrastim. They belive that these data support the use of biosimilar filgrastim in real-world practice, and that biosimilars present an opportunity to increase the sustainability of cancer treatment.
The study findings echo those of other recent studies that have supported the safety and efficacy of biosimilar filgrastim, including those that demonstrated no significant differences between biosimilar and reference filgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells, and no clinically meaningful differences in patients who switched between biosimilar filgrastim and its reference.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
FDA's Expanded Access: From Laetrile to Right to Try, Ethical Debates Over Early Drug Access
April 28th 2025Christopher T. Robertson, JD, PhD, reviewed the history and ethical landscape of providing access to drugs before FDA approval, highlighting the crucial role of clinical trials and ethical safeguards at the 2025 Festival of Biologics USA.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Addressing Patent Abuse, Reimbursement Models Key to Sustainable Biosimilar Market
April 25th 2025Sonia T. Oskouei, PharmD, emphasized strategies to streamline regulations and evolve to overcome barriers and expand the availability of cost-effective biosimilar treatments across more therapeutic areas.