A new study used flow cytometry to compare phosphorylation levels of intracellular epitopes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with psoriasis in clinical remission who were treated with reference infliximab versus healthy controls, and further evaluated whether a switch from reference infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 affected intracellular phosphorylation patterns.
Biologic treatments, including anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, can significantly improve psoriasis, but come at a high cost. While biosimilar therapies help to control the cost of biologic treatment, differences in manufacturing of innovator biologics and biosimilars have raised concerns about the potential to impact biological activity, efficacy, and tolerability.
A new study, published in the British Journal of Dermatology, used flow cytometry to compare phosphorylation levels of intracellular epitopes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients with psoriasis in clinical remission (n = 25) who were treated with reference infliximab versus healthy controls (n = 19), and further evaluated whether a switch from reference infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 affected intracellular phosphorylation patterns.
The researchers, led by Anders Krough Aarebrot, measured phosphorylation in PBMC before and after TNF stimulation in cells collected at inclusion, 3 months, and 12 months. Twenty-two patients were then randomized to either continue treatment with reference infliximab or switch to CT-P13.
The researchers found that:
The authors concluded that although there were significant differences in intracellular phosphorylation of PBMC between patients with psoriasis and healthy controls, a switch to biosimilar infliximab did not result in any significant differences, a finding that suggests that CT-P13 is noninferior to its reference.
The researchers note that this is the first study to use flow cytometry in PBMC comparing patients with psoriasis with healthy controls, or to monitor patients switching from biologics to biosimilars; they suggest that using flow cytometry might represent a promising tool to monitor disease activity and treatment efficacy in patients with psoriasis in the future.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Switching Patterns Highlight Nocebo Effect in European Patients Using Amgevita
July 23rd 2024About half of the patients in a European study who transitioned from reference adalimumab to a biosimilar version stayed on the biosimilar at the 1-year mark. However, researchers warned about a possible nocebo effect resulting in some patients switching back to the originator.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Eye on Pharma: EU Biosimilar Approval, Launches and Product Returns, Denosumab Switching Data
July 10th 2024The European Union approves a tocilizumab biosimilar and the US sees another launch, Genentech’s ophthalmology biobetter returns to the market, and Samsung Bioepis shares data on switching to its denosumab biosimilar.