A new study used flow cytometry to compare phosphorylation levels of intracellular epitopes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with psoriasis in clinical remission who were treated with reference infliximab versus healthy controls, and further evaluated whether a switch from reference infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 affected intracellular phosphorylation patterns.
Biologic treatments, including anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, can significantly improve psoriasis, but come at a high cost. While biosimilar therapies help to control the cost of biologic treatment, differences in manufacturing of innovator biologics and biosimilars have raised concerns about the potential to impact biological activity, efficacy, and tolerability.
A new study, published in the British Journal of Dermatology, used flow cytometry to compare phosphorylation levels of intracellular epitopes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients with psoriasis in clinical remission (n = 25) who were treated with reference infliximab versus healthy controls (n = 19), and further evaluated whether a switch from reference infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 affected intracellular phosphorylation patterns.
The researchers, led by Anders Krough Aarebrot, measured phosphorylation in PBMC before and after TNF stimulation in cells collected at inclusion, 3 months, and 12 months. Twenty-two patients were then randomized to either continue treatment with reference infliximab or switch to CT-P13.
The researchers found that:
The authors concluded that although there were significant differences in intracellular phosphorylation of PBMC between patients with psoriasis and healthy controls, a switch to biosimilar infliximab did not result in any significant differences, a finding that suggests that CT-P13 is noninferior to its reference.
The researchers note that this is the first study to use flow cytometry in PBMC comparing patients with psoriasis with healthy controls, or to monitor patients switching from biologics to biosimilars; they suggest that using flow cytometry might represent a promising tool to monitor disease activity and treatment efficacy in patients with psoriasis in the future.
Top 5 Most-Read Rheumatology Articles of 2024
December 30th 2024The top 5 rheumatology biosimilar articles of 2024 highlight significant FDA approvals, including high-concentration adalimumab and tocilizumab biosimilars, along with evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Empowering Vulnerable Populations: The Path to Equitable Biologic Therapy Access
December 22nd 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, senior vice president and system chief pharmacy officer at Providence, discusses strategies to improve equitable access to biologic therapies, including tiered formularies, income-based cost sharing, patient assistance programs, and fostering payer partnerships.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.