At the United European Gastroenterology Week 2019, held in Barcelona, Spain, earlier this year, a research team from the Netherlands reported on the prevalence of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) switching back to the reference infliximab after a previous switch to biosimilar CT-P13, and found that switching back appeared to be effective in patients with IBD.
Among the reasons documented for some patients discontinuing biosimilar infliximab after switching from the reference product are subjective loss of response and adverse events.
At the United European Gastroenterology Week 2019, held in Barcelona, Spain, earlier this year, a research team from the Netherlands reported on the prevalence of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) switching back to the reference infliximab after a previous switch to biosimilar CT-P13, and found that switching back appeared to be effective in patients with IBD.
In the retrospective, observation, multicenter cohort study, data from patients with IBD who had switched to CT-P13 and had at least 52 weeks of follow-up were eligible for inclusion. In total, 254 patients were switched, 165 of whom had Crohn disease (CD), 52 of whom had ulcerative colitis (UC), and 2 of whom had unclassified IBD.
In total, 35 patients switched back to the originator drug during the follow-up period. Those who made the switch back were more often female than those who remained on the biosimilar. In total, 91.4% of those who switched back did so because of newly reported side effects. Only 3 (8.6%) switched back due to loss of response.
The side effects most commonly reported were skin reactions (37.1%), increased IBD-related symptoms (37.1%), and fatigue (25.7%). Three patients had calprotectin-objectified loss of response.
In 75% of the patients who reported new side effects and in 100% of the patients with loss of response, switching back to the reference product had the desired effect of improving the side effects or regaining response.
The authors concluded that, for those who experience side effects or a loss of response after a switch to the biosimilar product, a switch back may be justified, and appears to have been effective in this group of patients with IBD.
Reference
Mahmmod S, Schultheiss JPD, Mahmmod N, Tan AC, Dijkstra G, Fidder HH. Reverse switching to originator infliximab may be considered in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases experiencing new side effects or loss of response after switching to a CT-P13 biosimilar. Presented at: United European Gastroenterology Week 2019; October 29-23, 2019; Barcelona, Spain.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
What Clinicians Need to Know About Using Biosimilars to Treat IBD
April 13th 2024A review article, intended to act as a guide for clinicians, summarizes the available infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as others that are coming down the pipeline.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for January 2024—Podcast Edition
February 4th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we reminisce on all the major gastroenterology news from January, which brought several reports quantifying how the gastroenterology biosimilar market is progressing and marked the 1-year anniversary of adalimumab biosimilar competition in the US.
Biosimilars Council: PBM Rebate Schemes Cost Americans, Payers $6 Billion
April 10th 2024A report from the Biosimilars Council evaluating IQVIA data found that rebate schemes orchestrated by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are costing US patients and payers billions of dollars by suppressing biosimilar adoption.