Investigators reported high overall response rates and savings of roughly $1400 per patient across cohorts.
A study of British patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who were treated with the rituximab biosimilar Truxima vs the originator (Rituxan) demonstrated comparable efficacy and tolerability between therapies, according to a recent study.
Investigators analyzed data from 201 patients treated by 46 UK-registered hematologists and oncologists in this retrospective survey. They evaluated charts for adult patients who received the biosimilar or originator as first-line immunotherapy between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019.
The use of biosimilar rituximab yielded not only comparable outcomes but also average cost savings of $1385 per patient. “These findings should inform decision makers on the potential for cost reductions where the biosimilar [Truxima] is available as a treatment alternative,” the investigators said.
They noted high overall response rates (ORRs) and 6-month progression-free survival (96%-98%) across cohorts, as well as 1-year survival of 98% to 100% across cohorts.
ORRs for patients with CLL who received Truxima vs Rituxan were 97.9% and 93.9%, respectively. For patients with NHL, the respective ORRs were 94.0% and 95.9%.
Complete response (CR) rates for patients receiving the biosimilar vs originator were 64.6% and 67.3% for CLL and 68.0% and 73.5% for NHL, respectively. Partial response rates were 33.3% and 26.5% for CLL and 26.0% and 22.4% for NHL.
Treatment discontinuations due to progression, death, or initiation of a subsequent line of therapy were 12.8% and 12.2 % for patients with CLL receiving Truxima vs Rituxan and 12.2% and 10.4% for patients in the NHL cohorts, respectively.
The investigators said 54% to 66% of patients across cohorts did not experience grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs); the most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, and infusion reactions.
They did note high health care resource utilization, including drug costs, diagnostic testing, office visits with oncologists, and hospital admissions.
Reference
McBride A, Daniel S, Driessen MT, et al. Real-world overall response rate and other outcomes related to originator and biosimilar rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the United Kingdom. Presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2021. Abstract e18696.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Promising Results for Ustekinumab, Adalimumab Biosimilars Presented at AAD
March 18th 2025Biocon’s ustekinumab biosimilar matched reference ustekinumab in efficacy and safety, while an adalimumab biosimilar proved interchangeable with reference adalimumab, according to posters at the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) annual meeting.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.