The researchers hypothesized that currently used doses of rituximab, of 375 mg/m2 or greater, significantly exceed the half-maximal effective dose of rituximab, at which differences between a biosimilar and the reference would be most likely to be found.
Among products that have thus far been candidates for biosimilar development, rituximab is unique in that it can be used in both oncology and rheumatology indications. However, dosing differs significantly for rituximab used in treating malignant versus nonmalignant disorders, and when rituximab is used off-label in treating immunological diseases, like multiple sclerosis, dosing schedules may vary even further.
This fact poses a challenge for demonstrating biosimilarity of a follow-on rituximab product in a patient population with nonmalignant disease, because no dose-finding trials are available in these indications, and it is as yet unclear which dose may be the most sensitive for detecting differences between proposed biosimilars and the reference rituximab.
A paper published in Scientific Reports describes 2 trials—an open-label, exploratory trial in healthy volunteers and a double-blind, randomized trial in healthy volunteers—that investigated the dose-response relationship of rituximab and a proposed biosimilar rituximab at low doses.
The researchers hypothesized that currently used doses of rituximab, of 375 mg/m2 or greater, significantly exceed the half-maximal effective dose of rituximab, at which differences between a biosimilar and the reference would be most likely to be found. Thus, their open-label trial assigned patients to receive either 0.1 mg/m2, 0.3 mg/m2, or 1.0 mg/m2 to identify the half-maximal effective dose of the reference product in vivo.
The trial enrolled 16 healthy volunteers, in whom rituximab depleted CD19-positive and CD20-positive cells from systemic circulation by the end of infusion. Mean CD20-positive cell counts decreased by approximately 97% in the 8 subjects in the 1-mg group, 74% in the 4 subjects in the 0.3-mg group, and 68% in the 4 subjects in the 0.1-mg group. Four weeks after infusion, CD20-positive cells returned to approximately 60% of baseline in the 1-mg group.
In the second trial, 36 volunteers were randomized to receive single infusions of either the reference rituximab or the proposed biosimilar at doses of either 0.1 mg/m2 or 0.3 mg/m2. Twelve participants each received the lower dose of the reference or the biosimilar, 8 received the higher dose of the biosimilar, and 4 received the higher dose of the reference.
In the lower-dose reference group, rituximab reduced the CD20-positive cell count by a mean of 48% (range, 25%-84%) and in the lower-dose biosimilar group, by a mean of 55% (range, 26%-85%).
In the higher-dose reference group, rituximab decreased CD20-positive cell counts by a mean of 81% (range, 67%-89%), and in the higher-dose biosimilar group, by a mean of 87% (range, 77%-96%).
The authors write that the half-maximal effective dose to deplete CD20-positive B cells with rituximab is 0.1 mg/m2, which represents “only a tiny fraction” of currently approved and used doses. Furthermore, they write, “Our results suggest that comparison of the effects of rituximab in the steep part of the dose-response curve is no longer possible when doses reach 1 mg/m2.” These findings will need to be verified in clinical trials involving patients, they add.
Reference
Schoergenhofer C, Schwameis M, Firbas C, et al. Single, very low rituximab doses in healthy volunteers—a pilot and a randomized trial: implications for dosing an biosimilarity testing. Sci Rep. 2018;8:124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17934-6.
Expanding Biosimilar Adoption: Insights and Strategies With Dr Sophia Humphreys
September 16th 2024Sophia Humphreys, PharmD, MHA, BCBBS, director of system formulary management at Sutter Health, discusses the challenges of expanding biosimilars into new therapeutic areas and highlights the role of education, competitive pricing, and integrated delivery networks in improving adoption and market growth.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Comparable Disease Activity, Drug Persistence in Patients With JIA Who Switch to Biosimilars
September 12th 2024Switching children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) from anti–tumor necrosis factor originators to biosimilars showed similar disease activity and drug persistence, with good tolerability, supporting the safety and effectiveness of non-medical switching.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
BioRationality: FDA Clarification Provides New Indications and Process Change for Biosimilars
September 9th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, explains the FDA's new guidelines on post-approval changes for biosimilars, emphasizing the processes for reporting modifications, comparability assessments, and the potential for biosimilars to introduce new indications or formulation changes, which could significantly impact their market competitiveness and accessibility.
Switching From Originator Etanercept to Biosimilar Version Proves Safe, Effective in RA
September 5th 2024Patients with rheumatoid arthritis who switched from the etanercept originator to a biosimilar exhibited similar disease activity and drug persistence compared with those who remained on the originator, indicating that nonmedical switching does not negatively impact treatment outcomes.