As the United Kingdom continues to move toward its exit from the European Union without an agreed-upon deal, the UK National Institute for Biological Standards and Control has issued new guidance for manufacturers of biologics in preparation for a no-deal Brexit, and the European Medicines Agency issued a new communication to drug makers seeking Brexit-related Type 1 variations to their marketing authorizations.
As the United Kingdom continues to move toward its exit from the European Union without an agreed-upon deal, the UK National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) has issued new guidance for manufacturers of biologics in preparation for a no-deal Brexit.
In the event of a no-deal scenario, the United Kingdom will no longer be subject to EU rules, and NIBSC will become a stand-alone entity. The United Kingdom will require NIBSC to certify batches of biologics before they can be placed on the UK market for any batches that were not certified by the European Union prior to March 29 (though exceptions will be made for batches manufactured and released in Switzerland and Israel, with whom the United Kingdom shares mutual recognition).
After March 29, the United Kingdom will carry out its own batch release of biologics, taking a risk-based approach to laboratory testing. In cases in which no certificates issued by a laboratory on an approved list are available, NIBSC will carry out its own laboratory assessments. NIBSC will use new statutory fees to fund its work.
If drug makers want to market batches of biologics in the United Kingdom after March 29 and they have not already been certified, drug makers will need to send samples and documentation for batches that will be sold in the UK market to NIBSC. While NIBSC will try to meet batch release turnaround times, the institute urges the early submission of documentation, and invites developers to contact NIBSC about interim arrangements that may be necessary for some products.
Also this month, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued a new communication to drug makers seeking Brexit-related Type 1 variations to their marketing authorizations. These variations are changes to authorizations that have little or no impact on the quality, safety, or efficacy of medicinal products. The EMA urged drug makers to file their Brexit-related variations as early as possible in March to allow the EMA to process all submissions (and issue confirmation of compliance with regulatory and legal requirements) before March 29.
The EMA says it expects to see more than a 50% increase in the number of variations filed over the next 3 months as companies submit Brexit-related changes to their marketing authorizations.
The new communications come with just 1 month left before Brexit. Recently, during the Medicines for Europe 18th Regulatory and Scientific Affairs Conference in London, United Kingdom, held from January 31 to February 1, a representative from the EMA told meeting attendees that only 27% of all affected centrally authorized products had completed all necessary pre-Brexit changes. As of November 2018, there were 19 products for human use that appeared to be at risk of not making changes in time.
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.