The FDA has approved a subcutaneously administered version of the brand-name trastuzumab, Herceptin. The new formulation, trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk, is a combination of the anticancer agent trastuzumab and an endoglycosidase that allows for the administration of higher volumes and enhanced absorption, and it has been approved under the name Herceptin Hylecta.
The FDA has approved a subcutaneously administered version of the brand-name trastuzumab, Herceptin. The new formulation, trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk, is a combination of the anticancer agent trastuzumab and an endoglycosidase that allows for the administration of higher volumes and enhanced absorption, and it has been approved under the name Herceptin Hylecta.
Approval of the subcutaneously administered product was based on 2 randomized trials. First, the HannaH trial compared the subcutaneous trastuzumab to the infused product in 596 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients were randomized to receive 8 cycles of chemotherapy with either the subcutaneous or the intravenous trastuzumab, followed by surgery and an additional 10 cycles of their assigned trastuzumab therapy. In total, 45.5% of patients in the subcutaneous arm and 40.7% of patients in the intravenous arm had a pathological complete response.
Second, the SafeHER trial, a 2-cohort, non-randomized, multinational, open-label trial, assessed the overall safety and tolerability of the subcutaneous trastuzumab together with chemotherapy in 1864 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The trial, in which patients received a fixed dose of the drug every 3 weeks for 18 cycles, confirmed the safety and tolerability of the fixed dose of the drug.
Not only does a subcutaneous injection of trastuzumab provide advantages for patients who may prefer the faster injection to a lengthy visit to an infusion center, the newly approved formulation has also been shown to save on costs in other regulatory territories where the drug is already widely in use. The subcutaneous formulation of the product is approved and available in the European Union, where research from 3 centers in Spain demonstrated that using the subcutaneous product results in reduced per-patient costs for an 18-cycle treatment of €1132.43 ($1335.68). Those savings derive from provider time costs, the costs of consumables, and the cost of trastuzumab, as well as indirect costs such as reduced productivity associated with infusions.
The cost savings associated with the formulation could be a reason for concern on the part of biosimilar developers. To date, the FDA has approved 3 biosimilar trastuzumab products: Mylan and Biocon’s Ogivri, Celltrion’s Herzuma, and Samsung Bioepis’ Ontruzant, all of which have yet to launch in the US market. While it remains to be seen how deep a discount any of the biosimilar makers will offer for their intravenously administered products upon launch, questions remain about how substantial those discounts will need to be to overcome the appeal and the potential cost savings represented by a subcutaneous formulation of the originator drug.
However, some researchers have voiced questions about the subcutaneous version of the product that may make biosimilars a more appealing cost-saving option. Writing in Pharmaceutical Medicine, authors recently pointed out that one of the main concerns with trastuzumab’s biological activity is its interaction with pertuzumab to treat HER2-positive cancer, and interactions among HER2 receptor, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab—anti-drug antibody complexes have not yet been fully evaluated with respect to the subcutaneous product. The phase 3 SAPPHIRE study did evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intravenous pertuzumab plus subcutaneous trastuzumab and a taxane, but the small population enrolled in the study made it difficult to draw conclusions.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.