The Therapeutic Goods Administration has announced that it will not use 4-letter suffixes in naming biologic and biosimilar medicines (as the FDA currently requires).
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia has announced that it will not use 4-letter suffixes in naming biologic and biosimilar medicines as the FDA currently requires.
The decision comes after several years of consideration and evaluation, and the adoption of different global approaches. When the time came to make a decision, the TGA considered 4 options:
TGA heard suggestions and concerns from various stakeholders in evaluating its decision. According to TGA, this decision is supported by most stakeholders. TAG’s position includes a future possible move toward adopting the EU’s barcode system, which incorporates the product code, national identification number, batch number, and expiry date.
In addition to the updated naming practice, the government also announced that its decision to strengthen AE reporting will include making the products’ brand name as well as non-proprietary name a mandatory field when reporting an AE.
The International Generic and Biosimilar medicines Association (IGBA) announced its support of the Australian Government’s decision to maintain the existing mandate for naming biologic and biosimilar medicines.
The government’s decision aligns with that of the European Union, which has approved the largest number of biosimilar medicines worldwide. The decision also aligns with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) approach to nomenclature.
The decision stands in contrast to the United States’ approach, however, whereby all biologics and biosimilars must have a 4-letter suffix, devoid of meaning, added to the end of newly approved biologics’ and biosimilars’ nonproprietary names. The first implementation of the FDA’s mandate to apply the suffix to newly approved innovator drugs came in November 2017 with the FDA approval of Roche’s Hemlibra (emicizumab-kxwh).
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.