Under the draft guidance for industry, the FDA is proposing how manufacturers could import versions of FDA-approved drug products that they sell in foreign countries that are the same as the US versions. Under this pathway, drug makers would use a new National Drug Code (NDC) and sell the products in the United States at a cheaper price—but different NDCs will not be available for use by biosimilar manufacturers.
The United States is proceeding with a notice of proposed rulemaking to allow states to submit proposals for importing medicine from Canada, as well as draft guidance for industry that would allow manufacturers to sell versions of drugs that they develop for overseas in the United States as well, but it appears that biosimilars would not have a route through either pathway.
The importation proposal was first raised in July.
Through the first pathway, states would send proposals to the FDA to allow the importation of small-molecule, brand-name medicines sold at retail pharmacies— typically ones that have rebates attached to them, according to HHS Secretary Alex Azar.
Some states—Florida, Vermont, and Colorado—have enacted legislation that allows them to import drugs, but they need HHS’ approval to proceed.
The proposed rulemaking targets Section 804 under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), which regulates US prescription drugs. Section 804 already gives the HHS secretary the authority to create regulations to allow pharmacists and wholesalers to import unapproved prescription drugs from Canada, as long as the secretary certifies that the program would create no additional risk to health and safety and would lower costs.
“This is a historic first step,” said Azar.
Under the draft guidance for industry, the FDA is proposing how manufacturers could import versions of FDA-approved drug products that they sell in foreign countries that are the same as the US versions. Under this pathway, drug makers would use a new National Drug Code (NDC) and sell the products in the United States at a cheaper price.
However, different NDCs will not be available for use by biosimilar manufacturers, he said.
Taken together, the plans aim to increase access, lower drug costs, and stimulate competition, administration officials said. However, Azar could not quantify how much could be saved, either by states or consumers.
Under the pilot plan for states, intravenous or infused drugs, biologics, or drugs with risk evaluation and mitigation strategies are not eligible for importation.
In order to meet the FDA’s criteria, drugs considered for importation must have been approved by Health Canada and would need to meet requirements for a New Drug Application (NDA) or an abbreviated NDA; the products would be relabeled for US use and sold through approved wholesalers and pharmacies.
“I want to repeat: we will not take steps that would put patients or our drug supply at risk,” said Azar.
Proponents of drug importation have noted that FDA-approved drugs are already made in foreign facilities that the FDA inspects and approves. “Provided the drugs consist of the same [active pharmaceutical ingredient] APIs in the same strengths, and they are administered by the same route…it is irrelevant with respect to health and safety risks whether the drugs were originally intended by the manufactured for sale in Europe or Canada or Asia or USA,” according to a report created for the Vermont state legislature earlier this year.
The continuing furor over drug costs often features widely used therapies, older therapies such as insulin, as well as costly biologics for autoimmune diseases.
Survey after survey has shown that American consumers are skipping doses or not filling prescriptions altogether due to rising drug costs.
The plan is opposed by the pharmaceutical industry lobbies on both sides of the US-Canadian border.
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.