A significant proportion of patients with Crohn disease (CD) who initially respond to infliximab therapy experience secondary loss of response with symptom flares. Treatment intensification (using increases in dose, dose frequency, or a combination of both to implement intensification) is a suggested strategy for regaining response.
A significant proportion of patients with Crohn disease (CD) who initially respond to infliximab therapy experience secondary loss of response with symptom flares. Treatment intensification (using increases in dose, dose frequency, or a combination of both to implement intensification) is a suggested strategy for regaining response. However, the development of antibodies to infliximab (ATI) negatively impacts the effectiveness of treatment intensification. Now, a new study, by Erwin Dreeson, PhD, and colleagues, published in the December 11, 2017, issue of Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, reports that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ATI concentrations can guide clinical decision-making on treatment intensification in patients with CD who have lost clinical response to infliximab.
Their retrospective cohort study was conducted in 103 Belgian patients with CD between January 2000 and October 2015. Patients who lost clinical response during infliximab maintenance therapy received an infliximab treatment intensification: 45 (44%) received a double dose; 45 (44%) underwent interval shortening, and 13 (13%) underwent combined interval shortening and dose doubling in an attempt to restore clinical response. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between the 3 intervention groups. Infliximab and ATI concentrations were measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 2 consecutive trough samples, just before (at T0) and after (at T+1) treatment intensification.
Clinical response to infliximab treatment intensification was defined as a marked decrease in or a disappearance of symptoms (based on the physicians’ global assessment). Biological response was evaluated in the subgroup of patients with elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) before treatment intensification, and was defined as a decrease from baseline CRP of at least 50% or a normalization of CRP. Biological remission was defined as a normalization of CRP. Clinical and biological outcomes were evaluated at T+1; follow-up continued for 1 year to assess treatment discontinuation and safety issues.
The researchers report that:
The authors conclude that their data support a role for measuring ATI concentrations in the context of “reactive” TDM—that is, to regain response. However, because it is not possible to act upon the measurement at the time samples are taken, the authors suggest performing TDM in a proactive manner to preventing loss of response. “When loss of response occurs, we recommend performing dose doubling over interval shortening,” they state. In the foreseeable future, the development of point-of-care assays will allow on-site availability of the analytical result, improving flexibility of both proactive and reactive TDM. Finally, the authors say that larger cohorts must be studied to explore the cost effectiveness of TDM based on infliximab and/or ATI concentrations.
AMCP Posters Tackle Interchangeability and Medicaid, Factors Driving Biosimilar Access
April 24th 2024Two posters from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) annual meeting explore how an interchangeable insulin glargine biosimilar plays into Medicaid budgets and the top factors driving access to biosimilars.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for January 2024—Podcast Edition
February 4th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we reminisce on all the major gastroenterology news from January, which brought several reports quantifying how the gastroenterology biosimilar market is progressing and marked the 1-year anniversary of adalimumab biosimilar competition in the US.
What Clinicians Need to Know About Using Biosimilars to Treat IBD
April 13th 2024A review article, intended to act as a guide for clinicians, summarizes the available infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as others that are coming down the pipeline.
Global Biosimilar Market Projected to Reach $1.3 Trillion by 2032
April 11th 2024The global biosimilar market is projected to surge from $25.1 billion in 2022 to approximately $1.3 trillion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 17.6%, driven mainly by the increasing prevalence of cancer and the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars, as outlined in a report by Towards Healthcare.