In an email to The Center for Biosimilars®, Mylan confirmed that it will launch its biosimilar pegfilgrastim at a wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of $4175 per syringe, a price that reflects a 33% discount to the WAC of Amgen’s reference product, Neulasta.
In addition to being the first drug developer to receive FDA approval for a pegfilgrastim biosimilar, Mylan plans to launch its product, the newly approved Fulphila, at a deeper discount to its reference than any other first biosimilar launched in the US marketplace.
In an email to The Center for Biosimilars®, Mylan confirmed that it will launch its biosimilar pegfilgrastim at a wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of $4175 per syringe, a price that reflects a 33% discount to the WAC of Amgen’s reference product, Neulasta.
Mylan’s strategy of beginning with such a substantial discount may reflect lessons learned from Celltrion and Pfizer’s launch of Inflectra. When the first biosimilar infliximab, referencing Remicade, launched at just a 15% discount to the reference’s WAC (following the example of Sandoz’s filgrastim biosimilar, Zarxio, which launched at a 15% discount to the reference Neupogen’s WAC), it struggled to gain market share.
With both the shallow discount and the reference product sponsor, Johnson & Johnson (J&J), offering incentives to continue to use the reference drug, payers saw little financial reason to undertake a change to the biosimilar. Pfizer has decried J&J’s strategies as anticompetitive in nature, and has filed suit against the Remicade maker. (J&J has countered, however, that Pfizer has not demonstrated the value of its product or a willingness to compete in the marketplace.)
With Inflectra already struggling to gain a foothold in the marketplace, Merck and Samsung Bioepis’ Renflexis, the second infliximab biosimilar to enter the US market, has seen little uptake despite its deeper launch discount of 35%.
Whether Mylan’s choice to offer such a substantial discount for its pegfilgrastim will help to overcome the hurdles of slow US biosimilar uptake remains to be seen, as does Mylan and partner Biocon’s strategy for pricing their other FDA-approved biosimilar, Ogivri, a trastuzumab product referencing Herceptin.
No launch date has been revealed for either of the Mylan—Biocon biosimilars, but the partnership made strides toward an eventual launch this month when it received the European Union’s Good Manufacturing Practice Certification for its biosimilar production plant in Bangalore, India. Manufacturing practices at the site have been called into question numerous times, most recently in May 2018, when the FDA issued a Form 483 related to 7 observations made during a preapproval inspection. In June 2018, Biocon confirmed that it had received an Establishment Inspection Report from the FDA, and that the inspection of the facility is now closed.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Global Biosimilar Market Projected to Reach $1.3 Trillion by 2032
April 11th 2024The global biosimilar market is projected to surge from $25.1 billion in 2022 to approximately $1.3 trillion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 17.6%, driven mainly by the increasing prevalence of cancer and the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars, as outlined in a report by Towards Healthcare.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Study: More Biosimilar Competition Is Not Lowering Patient OOP Costs
March 29th 2024Despite more biosimilars entering the market and generating significant savings for payers and health care systems, these savings are not resulting in lower out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for patients, according to a recent study.