The Biosimilars Forum said this week that if Congress enacted certain changes, the federal government and beneficiaries could save billions of dollars in Medicare Part B.
The Biosimilars Forum said this week that if Congress enacted certain changes, the federal government and beneficiaries could save billions of dollars in Medicare Part B.
The industry group said it commissioned a scoring analysis from Avalere Health examining options that could potentially reduce out-of-pocket costs (OOP) and federal spending in the range of $1.9 billion to $5.2 billion between 2020 and 2029, and cut beneficiary costs by $2.2 billion to $3.3 billion.
These actions could propel market share for biosimilars to 26% to 46% of the market. The group said their proposal follows the administration’s 2020 budget proposal that calls for “harnessing payment and cost-sharing incentives to increase biosimilar adoption.”
“It’s clear that incentivizing biosimilars will lower health care costs for patients and taxpayers,” said Juliana Reed, president of the Biosimilars Forum, in a statement. “Today’s scoring analysis proves that biosimilars need to be part of the solution to lower healthcare costs, but it will require proactive policy action to unlock these savings.”
The Avalere analysis was based on a range of assumptions. For instance, Congress could require CMS to use the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to create models designed to increase access to biosimilars, including a shared savings model. Medicare savings stemming from prescribing a biosimilar, as compared to a reference biologic, would be shared with providers.
Using 3 assumptions of a low, medium, and high provider-induced demand assumption, the shared savings program for providers in Medicare Part B would result in a budget-neutral outcome of $0 billion to a $3 billion decrease over the fiscal year 2020-2029 budget window. Average biosimilar market share is projected to reach 27% to 54% of the market, depending on the scenario.
Another option could involve using an additional add-on payment. This could save $8.2 billion in health costs over the time frame. This policy would incentivize doctors to prescribe biosimilars by increasing the amount they are paid in Medicare Part B.
Current proposals under consideration in Congress include a measure in the Senate to improve the Purple Book, crack down on patent abuses, and increase the amount of biosimilar education.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
British Columbia’s Biosimilar Policy Shows No Impact on Hospital Visits
May 28th 2025Despite a dramatic shift toward biosimilar use following British Columbia’s policy, researchers found no rise in hospital visits or complications, underscoring the real-world reliability of etanercept biosimilars in managing inflammatory arthritis.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
British Columbia’s Biosimilar Policy Shows No Impact on Hospital Visits
May 28th 2025Despite a dramatic shift toward biosimilar use following British Columbia’s policy, researchers found no rise in hospital visits or complications, underscoring the real-world reliability of etanercept biosimilars in managing inflammatory arthritis.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512