The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) announced that it will not be moving forward with its proposed revisions to drug product monographs for biologic medicines.
The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) recently announced that it will not be moving forward with its proposed revisions to drug product monographs for biologic medicines.
The proposed amendment sought to address the naming of biologic products licensed under the Public Health Service Act. For such products, “the official title shall be the title specified in the relevant monograph plus any suffix designated by the FDA unless otherwise specified in the applicable monograph.”
The revision received pushback from the FDA in the form of a letter, citing concerns that monographs for biologics could inhibit or delay innovative technology, and could be viewed as an additional burden on regulated industry.
“FDA is committed to supporting a robust marketplace of biological products that provide innovative, accessible, therapeutic options to patients. The timely licensure of biosimilar and interchangeable products is essential to achieving greater price competition in this marketplace, which can help bring down the cost of biological products. Thus, any delay in licensure of biosimilar or interchangeable products could cause these potential savings to consumers and the healthcare system to be lost,” the FDA’s letter said.
As of last week, USP stated that it will not move forward in addressing nomenclature issues without further collaboration with the FDA, as well as other stakeholders.
USP also indicated that it will continue its focus on developing “performance standards” applicable to classes of biologics, as well as standards for raw materials. USP is “developing these standards by working closely with industry to identify key challenges in biologics development and establishing benchmarks for quality.”
Separately, USP noted that it intends to move forward with another revision that aims to ensure alignment with the FDA on the use of the term “with sensor” in approved product names for therapies that contain sensor technology. The revised language ensures the continued applicability of the USP monograph for the corresponding drug product. Though the USP has not received comments from the FDA on this amendment thus far, it noted in a statement that it has previously received FDA support for this change.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.