Despite the fact that there are at least 5 biosimilar products with review timelines scheduled to come up for FDA review this year, and several previously rejected applications that could also be in line for review, 2017 may turn out to be a year that will be regarded as “a lull” in biosimilar approvals and marketing in the United States.1 This will further delay the development of a robust competitive environment with multiple biosimilars of the same reference product, which could potentially result in meaningful price reductions and improved access to important, expensive medications.
The FDA faces a year of changes and unknowns in 2017. There is a March 20 deadline for public comments on the agency’s recently released draft guidance on biosimilar interchangeability—a designation considered key to the long-term success of biosimilars—but it is not known when (or if) the FDA will make any such interchangeable designations. Another regulatory issue facing the FDA is the need to renew the Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA) program, which expires September 30, 2017. The BsUFA must first be approved by Congress and the Trump Administration before it takes effect. A renewed BsUFA agreement would provide a huge funding boost for biosimilar regulation and review activities, potentially improving FDA’s capacity for much-needed guidance development and educational initiatives for biosimilars.
In addition, several federal court decisions that will be made in 2017 are expected to have a great impact on US biosimilar approvals. The Supreme Court will rule on the Amgen-Sandoz Zarxio dispute over patent information exchange and biosimilar launch provisions in the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BCPIA). Additional hearings and trials for several other patent cases involving reference pharmaceuticals and biosimilars will affect whether new biosimilars will reach the US market this year. There are also reported to be a large number of BPCIA litigations that promise to be complex and continuing: one is AbbVie’s suit against Amgen over alleged infringement of Humira (adalimumab) patents that will potentially slow any launch of Amgen’s adalimumab biosimilar Amjevita, and the other is Amgen’s patent litigation against Novartis/Sandoz’s Erelzi (etanercept), an Enbrel biosimilar.
Finally, hanging over all of these issues is the possibility that the changes promised by the Trump administration with respect to repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will affect the BCPIA, which was enacted in 2010 as part of the ACA. There are also questions about the administration’s federal hiring freeze and whether it will affect the FDA’s user fee-funded positions that affect drug approvals and review.
Reference
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.