Access to therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) may not be consistent with treatment guidelines because of payer policies that do not concur with the American Gastroenterological Association clinical pathways for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.
Biologics and other advanced therapies have revolutionized the treatment of a number of inflammatory diseases, with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) in particular becoming subject to a more individualized treatment approach. However, access to therapy may not be consistent with treatment guidelines because of payer policies that do not concur with the American Gastroenterological Association clinical pathways for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.
In a paper recently published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, a research team sought to identify whether insurance coverage for such therapies for UC and CD is routinely approved in clinical practice. In the study, they evaluated patient access to biologics and advanced small-molecule therapies using commercial and government policy information derived from the Managed Markets Insight and Technology database, as well as publicly available medical policies, prior authorization information, and pharmacy drug list documents.
In total, 301,748,186 and 302,057,543 lives were captured in the database under the medical and pharmacy benefits, respectively. The investigators assessed coverage for adalimumab, infliximab, biosimilar infliximab, the orally administered small-molecule drug tofacitinib, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab.
They found that 89% of lives required no or 1 prior biologic use before accessing any of the drugs of interest for the treatment of UC or CD, with the exception of tofacitinib in UC and subcutaneous ustekinumab for CD; access for these 2 therapies was 68% and 71%, respectively.
Products that had wider coverage were originator infliximab, biosimilar infliximab, and adalimumab. Originator and biosimilar infliximab were covered under the medical benefit without prior biologic failure for 95% of lives, and with the failure of 1 prior biologic for 89.8% for UC. The infliximab products were covered for 95% and 90% of lives, respectively, for CD.
Adalimumab was covered under the pharmacy benefit for 99% of lives, without prior biologic failure or with 1 prior biologic, for UC and CD.
Among newer drugs, vedolizumab had the widest coverage; for UC and CD, 81% of lives had access to the therapy without a prior biologic exposure. Tofacitinib had lower access, with 43% of lives having access without prior biologic exposure. Rates of coverage without a prior biologic for subcutaneous ustekinumab were lower (49%) than for the intravenously administered version of the drug (86%).
The authors write that approximately half of all covered lives had access to all biologics—although not to the small-molecule tofacitinib—as first-line therapy for UC and CD, and two-thirds had access after 1 biologic exposure.
“With the emergence of new therapies, including biosimilars, there will be an increased pressure on payers to manage therapies and an increased responsibility on physicians to choose the most appropriate agent,” conclude the authors, adding that “it is important that modern physicians understand how to navigate coverage policies and advocate to create an individualized treatment pathway for each patient.”
Reference
Dulai PS, Osterman MT, Lasch K, Cao C, Riaz F, Sandborn WJ. Market access analytics of biologics and small-molecule inhibitors for inflammatory bowel disease among US health insurance policies [published online March 28, 2019]. Dig Dis Sci. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05594-7.
Comparable Disease Activity, Drug Persistence in Patients With JIA Who Switch to Biosimilars
September 12th 2024Switching children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) from anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) originators to biosimilars showed similar disease activity and drug persistence, with good tolerability, supporting the safety and effectiveness of non-medical switching.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for May 2024—Podcast Edition
June 2nd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review the biggest gastroenterology biosimilar stories from May 2024, covering new data from conferences and journals on infliximab and adalimumab products that demonstrate positive clinical results and confirm the safety of these biosimilars, as well as the feasibility of switching to them.
Eye on Pharma: Celltrion, Costco Partnership; Amgen Sues Samsung Bioepis; Denosumab Results
August 21st 2024Celltrion's adalimumab-aaty biosimilar is now accessible for all Costco members, while Amgen sues Samsung Bioepis over the latter’s denosumab biosimilar candidate, and GlycoNex progresses its denosumab biosimilar SPD8 to phase 3 trials.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
No Differences in Long-Term Drug Survival Between Biosimilar, Originator TNF Inhibitors
August 15th 2024An analysis of subcutaneous biosimilar and originator tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for rheumatic diseases found no significant differences in survival or discontinuation rates due to inefficacy or adverse events, with biosimilars showing lower overall discontinuation rates and higher retention rates.