AffaMed Therapeutics announced this week that it has received a Clinical Trial Application (CTA) approval from Chinese regulators to conduct a phase 3 clinical trial of Samsung Bioepis’ biosimilar trastuzumab, SB3.
AffaMed Therapeutics announced this week that it has received a Clinical Trial Application (CTA) approval from Chinese regulators to conduct a phase 3 clinical trial of Samsung Bioepis’ biosimilar trastuzumab, SB3.
SB3, also referred to as AMT901, is approved in the United States and the European Union under the name Ontruzant. The newly announced phase 3 study is expected to begin in the first quarter of 2020.
Approval of the application was based on a review of a comprehensive data package that included results from a clinical comparative study that found no clinically meaningful differences, in terms of efficacy and safety, between the biosimilar and the reference product in patients who have HER2-positive breast cancer.
“This CTA approval is an important milestone for AffaMed as we transition to a clinical-stage biotechnological company,” said Nathan Pang, MBBS, EMBA, chief executive officer of AffaMed, in a statement. “We are fully geared up to initiate this clinical development program, with the goal of providing AMT901 to help more Chinese patients at an affordable price.”
This new development comes after Samsung Bioepis reached a February 2019 agreement with private equity firm C-Bridge Capital to allow the drug maker to expand its reach into mainland China. Under the terms of the agreement, C-Bridge established AffaMed as a new company designed to collaborate with Samsung Bioepis on clinical development, regulatory activities, and commercialization of biosimilar products in China. In return, Samsung Bioepis will receive an upfront payment and royalties on sales.
In February, the parties announced that the agreement would cover multiple biosimilar candidates in Samsung Bioepis’ pipeline, including a ranibizumab biosimilar referencing Lucentis. The companies are also developing an aflibercept biosimilar, referencing Eylea.
The Next Frontier: Oncology Biosimilars in 2025 and Beyond
January 13th 2025The US oncology biosimilar market has rapidly evolved since its launch in 2017, driven by steep price discounts, payer adoption, and provider confidence, with an upcoming wave of biosimilars targeting blockbuster biologics promising further market growth, cost savings, and broader patient access.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Equivalence Confirmed: CT-P41 Paves the Way for Affordable Osteoporosis Care
January 8th 2025Celltrion’s denosumab biosimilar demonstrated equivalent efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity compared with the originator in a phase 3 trial involving postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, paving the way for improved accessibility and cost savings in osteoporosis treatment.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Study Confirms CT-P42 Therapeutic Equivalence to Reference Aflibercept in DME
January 6th 2025The phase 3 trial showed biosimilar CT-P42 (Celltrion) is therapeutically equivalent to reference aflibercept in improving visual acuity in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), with comparable efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity at 24 weeks, with more long-term data expected.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.