This week, Amgen announced that the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has issued a positive opinion recommending a label variation for its reference pegfilgrastim to now include the branded Neulasta Onpro Kit.
This week, Amgen announced that the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has issued a positive opinion recommending a label variation for its reference pegfilgrastim to now include the branded Neulasta Onpro Kit. Following the CHMP positive opinion, the centralized European marketing authorization of reference pegfilgrastim will be updated to include the delivery system of the device in its label.
The Onpro Kit device uses pegfilgrastim in an on-body injector that allows a patient to forego a visit to the physician’s office to receive an injection of the drug.
“The Neulasta Onpro Kit is a showpiece of our patient-centric approach and continued investment in advancing the field of G-CSF administration,” said David M. Reese, MD, senior vice president of translational sciences and oncology at Amgen, in a statement.
The Onpro Kit has been approved in the United States since August 2015, and can be very costly. The eventual introduction of pegfilgrastim biosimilars into the marketplace could provide competition to the reference product due to lower prices, but the convenience provided by the on-body device could help Amgen to retain its market share for the reference drug.
Meanwhile, Gedeon Richter, a German-based pharmaceutical company, announced today that the EMA has accepted its resubmission of a marketing authorization application (MAA) for a proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar.
In December 2016, following a meeting with the CHMP, Gedeon Richter withdrew its MAA due to committee concerns that the data provided did not allow for a positive benefit-risk assessment.
Gedeon Richter made the decision to resubmit its application to the EMA after completion of an additional clinical study that provided data demonstrating similarity of both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the proposed biosimilar and reference Neulasta.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.