Russian biosimilar developer Biocad has won a legal battle that will allow it to move forward with its rituximab biosimilar.
Russian biosimilar developer Biocad has won a legal battle that will allow it to move forward with its rituximab biosimilar.
The Pharma Letter reports that Biocad triumphed in a patent dispute over rituximab with Swiss drug developer and maker of the reference rituximab (Rituxan, MabThera), Roche. The Russian government’s Chamber for Patent Disputes announced that Roche—Genentech’s patent covering the use of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis was invalid. The ruling clears the way for Biocad to produce and commercialize a biosimilar of the anti–tumor necrosis factor agent that is used in the treatment of both cancer and rheumatologic diseases.
In June, Biocad gained authorization to market the biosimilar rituximab as Usmal in Bolivia and Honduras, and has already begun selling the drug in 7 other markets, including Kazakhstan, Vietnam, and Sri Lanka.
Biocad also announced its intentions to enter the European marketplace with both its innovator and biosimilar products, and said that it expects to receive marketing authorization from the European Medicines Association beginning in 2021. According to Biocad, the company is ready to provide dossiers of its medicines that align with the International Council for Harmonization Common Technical Document format. In May, Biocad took its first steps toward European market entry when it established a new Eurozone presence in Turku, Finland. Biocad plans to invest €25 million (approximately $28 million) in Finland’s Turku region over the next 7 years as it continues to develop products for the European market.
Despite its legal gains in Russia and its eye on global expansion, Biocad still faces hurdles to entering the United States market; in 2016, Biocad filed suit in a New York district court alleging that competitor Roche and other drug makers were engaged in an anticompetitive scheme that blocked Biocad from entering the US oncology drug marketplace. Biocad alleged that its competitors were increasing the prices of their drugs in the United States while selling the same products at deep discounts in Russia.
The judge dismissed the case, saying that US antitrust laws do not extend to conduct in Russia, and the effect of the activities in Russia on the United States market were too attenuated for the court to have jurisdiction over the claims.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.