The administration said the update to the dashboards is part of its effort to improve transparency around drug pricing; the administration also wants to shift some Part B coverage to Part D as part of its plan to reduce total drug spending, with the idea that Part D plan sponsors would have more negotiating room with pharmaceutical companies.
CMS recently updated its drug spending dashboards with data for 2017, displaying pricing and spending data for thousands of drugs across Medicare Parts B and D and Medicaid.
In 2017, total gross spending on prescription drugs was $154.9 billion in Medicare Part D, $30.4 billion in Part B, and $67.6 billion in Medicaid.
The drug dashboards last updated in May of last year. The administration said it is part of its effort to improve transparency around drug pricing; the administration also wants to shift some Part B coverage to Part D as part of its plan to reduce total drug spending, with the idea that Part D plan sponsors would have more negotiating room with pharmaceutical companies.
The dashboards focus on average spending per dosage unit for prescription drugs and track the change in average spending per dosage unit over time. The web-based tool (or the downloadable spreadsheet, which has more information) can be sorted by manufacturer, drug, price, and more.
“The dashboards pinpoint the sources of rising prescription drug prices to help guide our continued work to address this problem,” said CMS Administrator Seema Verma. She said that, from 2013-2017, prescription drug spending grew at an average annual rate of 10.6% in Medicare Part D, 10% in Part B, and 14.8% in Medicaid.
Verma said in her statement that the tool could be used, for instance, to help doctors and patients compare prices.
However, while the CMS spreadsheets include the number of manufacturers available for a given drug, they do not indicate whether a biosimilar is available for brand-name biologics.
Some of the cost increases for brand-name biologic products include the following:
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.