Yesterday, community oncology leaders flooded the Hill to meet with Congress and the administration to warn them of the impact the Medicare sequester’s increased cuts and extension will have on cancer care nationwide.
Yesterday, community oncology leaders flooded the Hill to meet with Congress and the administration to warn them of the impact the Medicare sequester’s increased cuts and extension will have on cancer care nationwide.
The emergency Community Oncology Alliance (COA) fly-in was prompted by the momentum of the tax bill in both the US House and Senate. The bill proposes to raise the current sequester from 2% to 4%, as well as extend cuts at the end of the 10-year budget window.
In 2013, CMS enacted a 2% sequester payment cut to Medicare. The cut was originally intended to be an incentive to design an alternative budget savings package. The cut, signed into law in August 2011, set up the US cancer care system for consolidation and increased costs to seniors, Medicare, and taxpayers, says COA.
Since the sequester was enacted, the effect on the cancer care community has been felt across the nation. According to COA’s 2016 Practice Impact Report:
“We had over a dozen oncology leaders on the Hill yesterday talking about the devastating impact that this would have…not only would it be devastating, but it would be irresponsible of Congress,” Ted Okon, MBA, COA’s executive director, told The Center for Biosimilars® in an interview. “Regardless of whether this tax bill passes, we’ve been arguing all year that CMS in the prior administration should not have applied the sequester to Part B Medicare drugs. We’re at the point now that we’ve been working with Congress and talking to the current administration, and it remains to be seen what we’ll do next if they don’t either legislatively fix this, or if they don’t stop it from a regulatory standpoint.”
Jeff Vacirca, MD, president of COA and CEO of New York Cancer Specialists, also had a strong message for lawmakers. “Our elected officials need to understand that this sequester may seem like funny money to them but it is a slow bleed closing cancer clinics and forcing them into the waiting arms of more expensive hospital systems—especially those profiting off 340B. Congress needs to understand that their doubling down on the sequester and constantly extending it will result in community oncology practices being forced to shut their doors, which will cause access issues for patients and increase treatment costs as cancer care shifts to expensive hospitals,” said Vacirca in a statement.
Eye on Pharma: BI Cyltezo Partnership; Europe Ustekinumab Launch; Mexico Biosimilar Approval
July 24th 2024Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) partners with GoodRx to offer its unbranded adalimumab biosimilar to patients at an exclusive low price; a new ustekinumab biosimilar launches in Europe; and Mexican officials approve a bevacizumab biosimilar.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
BioRationality: Time to Get Rid of PBMs if Biosimilars Are to Succeed
July 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, discusses the challenges with pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that plague the biosimilar industry and new legislation that attempts to reform their practices and encourage biosimilar adoption.