Drug prices in several disease areas outpace other healthcare expenditures and result in inadequate availability of essential medicines globally, according to a recently published review.
The cost of the cancer drug Gleevec tripled after the FDA approved a new indication, the $1000-per-pill hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment Sovaldi accounted for 64% of US HCV-related spending in 2014, and the cost of the 60-year-old drug Daraprim went from $13.50 per pill to $750 per pill after Turing Pharmaceuticals acquired its distribution license. Reports like these led to hearings in the US Congress examining the pricing practices of pharmaceutical companies. In the United Kingdom, costly cancer immunotherapies faced rejection for National Health Service coverage reimbursement, and the German government is planning to curb pharmaceutical companies’ right to set launch prices. The sharply rising prices of prescription medications even became an issue in the 2016 US presidential election.
Drug prices in several disease areas outpace other healthcare expenditures and result in inadequate availability of essential medicines globally, according to a review by Toon van der Gronde, PharmD, and colleagues in a recent issue of PLOS One. They note that high prices for medicines, however innovative, are untenable and often beyond the ability of individuals, health insurance companies, or even governments in high-income countries to pay. Health systems therefore face a challenge in striking a balance between rewarding investments in innovation, achieving reasonable drug prices, and securing equitable access to medicines—a challenge that demands new policies to prevent a continued drug pricing spiral, van der Gronde and colleagues conclude.
The investigators searched PubMed for peer-reviewed English-language scientific articles on drugs and cost as well as reputable news outlets such as the Financial Times, The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and The Guardian for articles concerning the pricing of medicines between January 2014 and January 2017. Their review first examines the concepts of drug life-cycle dynamics, government interventions aimed at reducing drug prices, and the consequences of those interventions, and then suggests alternative policy measures to reduce drug prices and improve access to innovative and essential medications.
Van der Gronde and colleagues argue that fertile ground for high-priced drugs was created by several factors:
Van der Gronde and colleagues recommend the following steps to reduce drug prices:
HHS Praises Biosimilars Savings but Opportunities to Reduce Part B Spending Remain
November 28th 2023Although biosimilars have already generated savings for Medicare Part B programs and beneficiaries, opportunities for substantial reductions in spending remain, according to a report from the HHS.
Biosimilar Business Roundup for October 2023—Podcast Edition
November 5th 2023On this episode, we discuss the biggest news to come out of October 2023, including 3 regulatory approvals, 2 complete response letters, and new data and industry insights that have the potential to impact the entire US biosimilar industry.
Biosimilars Regulatory Roundup for September 2023—Podcast Edition
October 1st 2023On this episode, we discuss several regulatory updates from around the globe, including some European and Japanese approvals, the FDA’s 2-day workshop on the present science behind clinical efficacy testing for biosimilars, and streamlining biosimilar development.
Part 3: Study Questions Usefulness of Clinical Efficacy Trials for Oncology Biosimilars in Europe
November 16th 2023In part 3 of a 3-part series for Global Biosimilars Week, The Center for Biosimilars® reviews an analysis investigating whether clinical efficacy studies have an impact on prescribing decisions for oncology biosimilars across Europe.