Drug prices in several disease areas outpace other healthcare expenditures and result in inadequate availability of essential medicines globally, according to a recently published review.
The cost of the cancer drug Gleevec tripled after the FDA approved a new indication, the $1000-per-pill hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment Sovaldi accounted for 64% of US HCV-related spending in 2014, and the cost of the 60-year-old drug Daraprim went from $13.50 per pill to $750 per pill after Turing Pharmaceuticals acquired its distribution license. Reports like these led to hearings in the US Congress examining the pricing practices of pharmaceutical companies. In the United Kingdom, costly cancer immunotherapies faced rejection for National Health Service coverage reimbursement, and the German government is planning to curb pharmaceutical companies’ right to set launch prices. The sharply rising prices of prescription medications even became an issue in the 2016 US presidential election.
Drug prices in several disease areas outpace other healthcare expenditures and result in inadequate availability of essential medicines globally, according to a review by Toon van der Gronde, PharmD, and colleagues in a recent issue of PLOS One. They note that high prices for medicines, however innovative, are untenable and often beyond the ability of individuals, health insurance companies, or even governments in high-income countries to pay. Health systems therefore face a challenge in striking a balance between rewarding investments in innovation, achieving reasonable drug prices, and securing equitable access to medicines—a challenge that demands new policies to prevent a continued drug pricing spiral, van der Gronde and colleagues conclude.
The investigators searched PubMed for peer-reviewed English-language scientific articles on drugs and cost as well as reputable news outlets such as the Financial Times, The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and The Guardian for articles concerning the pricing of medicines between January 2014 and January 2017. Their review first examines the concepts of drug life-cycle dynamics, government interventions aimed at reducing drug prices, and the consequences of those interventions, and then suggests alternative policy measures to reduce drug prices and improve access to innovative and essential medications.
Van der Gronde and colleagues argue that fertile ground for high-priced drugs was created by several factors:
Van der Gronde and colleagues recommend the following steps to reduce drug prices:
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.