In a surprise decision, the FDA has delayed a ruling on the approval of Eli Lilly’s highly anticipated once-daily investigational rheumatoid arthritis (RA) drug baricitinib, instead issuing a complete response letter (CRL) to Lilly and its partner Incyte asking for additional clinical data on dosing and safety concerns. Lilly and Incyte disagree with the FDA’s conclusions and said more discussion with the agency might help speed the resubmission of data for the drug.
Baricitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor currently in clinical studies for its effect on inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Baricitinib had generated a good deal of excitement after the February 2017 publication of a study published in The New England Journal of Medicine that showed baricitinib produced significant clinical improvements in RA symptoms compared with placebo and adalimumab (Humira) when combined with methotrexate for patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate alone. The study suggests baricitinib may be an effective oral alternative to adalimumab, which is an infusion.
“We are disappointed with this action,” the company said, remaining confident in the benefit/risk of baricitinib as a new treatment option for adults with moderate to severe RA.
Lilly and Incyte had submitted data on baricitinib to the FDA in January 2016, a majority of which was positive. The companies also submitted additional data from a long-term extension study that suggested the drug’s previously recorded positive effects could be maintained for at least 48 weeks. These positive data had led some analysts to project $1.8 billion in sales for baricitinib by 2022 if it had been approved.
The FDA had already extended its review period of baricitinib by 3 months. Analysts had expected the agency to approve the drug, especially after its European approval in February 2016.
The delay in approving baricitinib resulting from the FDA’s decision to issue a CRL will be good news, however, for Sanofi and Regeneron, whose interleukin-6 inhibitor sarilumab—another RA drug that is expected to potentially become a blockbuster—may be approved imminently by the FDA. The delay in baricitinib’s marketing also potentially benefits Pfizer’s RA drug tofacitinib citrate (Xeljanz), which was approved in 2016 but has not yet generated expected sales.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.