A recent study from Romania examined the efficacy and safety of biosimilar etanercept SB4 (Benepali) compared to originator etanercept in a real-life cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
A recent study from Romania examined the efficacy and safety of biosimilar etanercept SB4 compared to originator etanercept in a real-life cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Romania reimburses both the original etanercept (Enbrel) as well as the biosimilar, which is made by Samsung Bioepis. The biosimilar is approved in multiple regulatory territories under the names Benepali, Brenzys, and Eticovo. The biosimilar earned its first approval in the Republic of Korea in 2015, followed by approvals in the European Union, Canada, Australia, and other markets 2016, and the United States in 2019 (where it is not yet launched). In Romania, it has been available since 2017.
In this study, the authors noted that a phase 3 trial concluded that SB4 had equivalent efficacy, reduced immunogenicity, and a comparable safety profile to the reference. However, they also noted that real-life eligibility criteria are different in Romania, with possible lower joint counts, possible higher disease duration, and the required use of at least 2 conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with RA prior to the use of any biologics.
Researchers used national registry data for patients who started treatment with either the reference product or SB4 between July 2017 and April 2019. The study included 242 patients with efficacy and safety data after 6 months of treatment: 123 (50.8%) with the original etanercept, and 119 (49.2%) with SB4.
There were no significant differences after 6 months regarding composite scores of RA activity between patients using either drug (eg, remission defined by disease activity score in a count of 28 joints (DAS28): 18.7% in the reference group group and 17.6% in the biosimilar group, P = .823; Boolean remission: 11.4% in the reference group and 11.8% in the biosimilar group, P = .926). There were 11 adverse events (AE) in patients receiving the reference product (including 3 severe AEs: lower respiratory tract infection, enterocolitis, and anaphylaxis) and 12 AEs in the SB4 group (including 4 severe AEs: lower respiratory tract infection, vasculitis, anaphylaxis, and rash).
Compared to patients starting treatment with the originator project product, patients using the biosimilar product were more frequently naïve to biologics, had a significantly higher prevalence of positivity to anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, and had more active disease, the researchers said. Higher disease activity probably stemmed from the fact that there was a higher prevalence of biologic-naïve patients at baseline.
The researchers also discussed the role of cost in making decisions about whether to use a biosimilar; although noting the savings that are available, the authors wrote that "a safe strategy for now would be to initiate bDMARD [biologic]-naïve patients on biosimilars and to continue reference products until their natural outcome (switch due to loss of efficacy and AE, tapering and stopping due to sustained remission). This strategy should by tested by pharmaco-economic studies in different countries and therapeutic decisions should involve the patient."
Reference
Codreanu C, Popescu CC, Mogosan C, et al. Efficacy and safety of original and biosimilar etanercept (SB4) in active rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison in a real-world national cohort [published online October 24, 2019]. Biologicals. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2019.10.009.
Eye on Pharma: Bevacizumab Update; Samsung Bioepis, J&J Settlement; Another EU Trastuzumab
December 6th 2023Outlook Therapeutics provides an update on the development of its bevacizumab candidate for age-related macular degeneration; Samsung Bioepis settles with Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over its ustekinumab biosimilar candidate; and the European Union gains another trastuzumab biosimilar.
Dr Fran Gregory Sizes Up the US Adalimumab Market: Will Biosimilars See Success?
September 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Fran Gregory, PharmD, MBA, vice president of emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, analyzes the adalimumab market so far in the United States and provides insight into how the market needs to adapt to accept these products and ensure lower drug costs for patients.
HHS Praises Biosimilars Savings but Opportunities to Reduce Part B Spending Remain
November 28th 2023Although biosimilars have already generated savings for Medicare Part B programs and beneficiaries, opportunities for substantial reductions in spending remain, according to a report from the HHS.
Adalimumab Biosimilars Take Center Stage: A Game Changer for IBD Treatment
July 16th 2023Laura Wingate, from the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation, explains some of the challenges regarding educating patients and providers on biosimilars for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as whether the gastroenterology space is ready for the influx of adalimumab biosimilars.
Public Payer in Poland Saves €243 Million by Using Biosimilar TNF Inhibitors
November 11th 2023The use of biosimilars of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors within Poland’s public payer saved over €243 million from 2013 to 2021, with about 68% of that coming from the rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases alone.
Real-World Data Confirm Safety, Efficacy of CT-P13 in Inflammatory Diseases
November 9th 2023A real-world analysis from Japan confirmed that CT-P13, an intravenous infliximab biosimilar, had comparable safety and efficacy to the reference product (Remicade; infliximab) in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.