The results will inform will inform counseling and management of pregnant women with inflammatory diseases who need tofacitinib or non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitors during pregnancy, said the author.
Very few serious infections were seen in children born to mothers with chronic inflammatory diseases who used biologics that are non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (non-TNFI) biologics or tofacitinib, an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, compared with children not exposed to these drugs as well as children exposed to anti—tumor necrosis factors (anti-TNFs) in utero, according to an abstract presented at the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)’s 2019 meeting, being held in Atlanta, Georgia, this week.
Tofacitinib was first approved in 2012 to treat adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis who did not respond well to methotrexate. In 2017, it was cleared for patients with psoriatic arthritis who did not respond well to methotrexate or other similar medicines, and it was approved for ulcerative colitis, part of inflammatory bowel conditions (IBD), in 2018.
Non-TNF biologics include abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab. Anti-TNF biologics include etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab.
The study identified all women with 1 or more hospitalization for delivery after a diagnosis of RA, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriasis, or inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), and a randomly selected group of unaffected mothers, matched 4:1 for age, year of delivery, and state of residence. Researchers used the MarketScan database for the period 2011 to 2016.
The researchers defined drug exposure as 1 or more filled prescription and/or infusion procedure codes during pregnancy and/or the preconception period. The anti-TNF biologics included in the study were abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, ustekinumab and vedolizumab.
Serious infections in the offspring were defined as 1 or more hospitalizations with infection as the primary diagnosis within the first year of life.
Exposure groups in the study were characterized by maternal demographics, disease type, comorbidities, pregnancy complications and use of drugs, such as corticosteroids, non-biologic disease modifying agents, or biologics.
Participants included 16,490 offspring of mothers with RA (4142), AS (381), psoriasis or PsA (5743) and IBD (6731), as well as 164,553 children born to unaffected matched mothers.
Among the offspring of mothers who had inflammatory diseases, 105 were exposed to tofacitinib or non-TNFi biologics, including 4 to tofacitinib, 33 to abatacept, 4 to rituximab, 12 to tocilizumab, 42 to ustekinumab and 10 to vedolizumab. In addition, 1611 offspring were exposed to anti-TNF biologics during pregnancy.
The researchers found 2 cases of serious infections in children exposed to tofacitinib or non-TNFi biologics: 1 to tofacitinib and 1 to abatacept.
They found that the percent of serious infections in offspring of inflammatory disease mothers with no anti-TNF exposure was 2.1, while for those with exposure in utero exposure, it was 2.3. They also found 1.6% of children born to unaffected mothers had serious infections.
Pregnant patients are excluded from clinical trials, noted Evelyne Vinet, MD, PhD, associate professor of rheumatology and clinical epidemiology at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and the study’s lead author, and real-world evidence is lacking. Moreover, some women find that their disease worsens in pregnancy and may negatively impact pregnancy outcomes.
During pregnancy, circulating immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies from the mother are actively transported across the placenta. Some biologic drugs have the potential to cross the placenta too, and often reach higher levels in the fetus than in the mother. This possibility raises concerns that exposed offspring could develop immunosuppression.
In addition, it has also been hypothesized that small-molecule drugs may cross the placenta, although this remains unconfirmed.
“Our findings will help guide counseling and management of pregnant women with inflammatory arthritis that require non-TNFi biologics and tofacitinib during pregnancy,” she said.
Reference
Vinet E, St-Pierre Y, Moura CS, Curtis J, Bernatsky S. Serious infections in offspring exposed in utero to non-TNFi biologics and tofacitinib. Presented at: The American College of Rheumatology Annual Meeting, November 8-13, 2019; Atlanta, Georgia.
IQVIA Highlights Opportunity to Cash In on Biosimilars for Biologics Losing Market Exclusivity
November 29th 2023A report from IQVIA noted that Europe could miss out on €15 billion in cost savings by not having biosimilars for medications about to lose market exclusivity, shedding light on the implications for overall health care savings and ultimately, patient access.
Dr Fran Gregory Sizes Up the US Adalimumab Market: Will Biosimilars See Success?
September 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Fran Gregory, PharmD, MBA, vice president of emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, analyzes the adalimumab market so far in the United States and provides insight into how the market needs to adapt to accept these products and ensure lower drug costs for patients.
Eye on Pharma: Adalimumab Updates; New Eylea Biosimilar Lawsuit; Canada Gains Stelara Biosimilar
November 22nd 2023Several companies make moves to further their adalimumab biosimilars, Regeneron sues Celltrion over biosimilar for Eylea (aflibercept), and Health Canada grants marketing authorization for biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab).
Adalimumab Biosimilars Take Center Stage: A Game Changer for IBD Treatment
July 16th 2023Laura Wingate, from the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation, explains some of the challenges regarding educating patients and providers on biosimilars for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as whether the gastroenterology space is ready for the influx of adalimumab biosimilars.
Study: Biosimilar Use, Dose Rounding Produce More Cost Savings Than Either Strategy Alone
November 18th 2023A retrospective study of New England patients receiving trastuzumab or bevacizumab found that combining dose rounding and biosimilar use resulted in greater cost savings than either strategy alone.
Part 3: Study Questions Usefulness of Clinical Efficacy Trials for Oncology Biosimilars in Europe
November 16th 2023In part 3 of a 3-part series for Global Biosimilars Week, The Center for Biosimilars® reviews an analysis investigating whether clinical efficacy studies have an impact on prescribing decisions for oncology biosimilars across Europe.