While real-world data, such as those derived from the NOR-SWITCH study, have been reassuring about the feasibility of switching patients with inflammatory diseases from reference infliximab (Remicade) to biosimilar CT-P13 (sold as Inflectra and Remsima), some ambiguous data in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have raised questions among clinicians about switching in the indications of Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis.
While real-world data, such as those derived from the NOR-SWITCH study, have been reassuring about the feasibility of switching patients with inflammatory diseases from reference infliximab (Remicade) to biosimilar CT-P13 (sold as Inflectra and Remsima), some ambiguous data in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have raised questions among clinicians about switching in the indications of Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Now, new evidence—from the largest study to date in patients with IBD who switched to CT-P13—may answer some of those questions.
The prospective, observational, open-label, multicenter cohort study involved a nonmedical switch undertaken at 4 hospitals in Sweden. The 313 patients treated for IBD in these hospitals (195 for CD and 118 for UC), were switched to the biosimilar. The primary endpoint of the study was change in disease activity at 2, 6, and 12 months postswitch.
Patients received written and verbal education about the switch, and their individual regimens, including infusion intervals and concomitant medication, were not altered in connection with the switch. All but 1 patient was receiving maintenance therapy at the time of the switch. A full 12-month follow-up period was completed by 250 patients.
In total, 10 patients (3.2%) discontinued CT-P13 due to disease remission, 23 (7.4%) discontinued due to lack of efficacy, and 15 (4.8%) due to adverse events (AEs). No significant changes in disease activity (as measured by Harvey-Bradshaw Index or Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index) were observed between baseline and 2, 6, and 12 months after the switch.
Blood test biomarkers of disease activity did not indicate disease worsening after the switch in either the CD group or the UC group. The mean fecal calprotectin value was increased at 1 months in patients with CD, but not at months 6 or 12 (no significant changes in fecal calprotectin were observed in patients with UC). There were no significant changes in quality of life as measured by Short Heatlh Scale at months 2, 6, or 12. Drug trough levels did not change significantly during followup.
AEs of any type occurred in 24.1% of patients with CD and 21.2% of patients with UC. In 15 cases, AEs led to discontinuation. Rash, fatigue, arthralgia, and headache were the most commonly reported AEs. The number of serious AEs during follow-up was 7 (2.2%).
Notably, disease worsening occurred in 14.0% of patients with CD and 13.8% of patients with UC, which is notable in comparison with NOR-SWITCH data, which showed disease worsening in 36.5% of those with CD and 11.9% of those with UC at 12 months.
“In conclusion, we have demonstrated that switching from Remicade to CT-P13 may be done with preserved therapeutic effectiveness and safety in patients with IBD,” wrote the investigators, adding that “the concerns raised by several previous studies, including a potential difference in the efficacy of CT-P13 in CD compared with UC, were refuted.”
Reference
Bergqvist V, Kadivar M, Molin D, et al. Switching from originator infliximab to the biosimilar CT-P13 in 313 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018;11: 1756284818801244. doi: 10.1177/1756284818801244.
The Growing Impact of Biosimilars in IBD Care
April 23rd 2025Biosimilars are proving to be a game-changing solution in the fight against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), offering a cost-effective alternative to biologics with similar efficacy and safety, while innovative drug delivery systems promise to further enhance treatment outcomes and accessibility for millions worldwide.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Biosimilar and Biologic Use Increasing in Greek Patients With IBD
April 19th 2025A retrospective study from a single inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center in Greece reported that from 2018 to 2022, the use of biologics increased by 28% yearly, and the proportion of patients using biosimilars grew from 33% to 67%.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Early Success of Adalimumab Biosimilars Featured at AMCP 2025
April 5th 2025High adherence rates, comparable clinical effectiveness, and cost savings have marked the early adoption of adalimumab biosimilars in the US, particularly in formulary-driven transitions, as shown in 2 retrospective studies presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy annual meeting (AMCP 2025).