The updated treatment approach will allow clinicians, based on individual patients’ outcomes, to lengthen the intervals between injections for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who are already in the first year of treatment. That could mean fewer injections and fewer trips to the clinic for patients with AMD.
Bayer has announced that the European Commission has approved a new treatment regimen for aflibercept (Eylea). The updated treatment approach will allow clinicians, based on individual patients’ outcomes, to lengthen the intervals between injections for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who are already in the first year of treatment. That could mean fewer injections and fewer trips to the clinic for patients with AMD.
Approval for the new regimen is based on findings from the phase 4 ALTAIR study1, which tested a so-called “treat-and-extend” approach to AMD at 40 sites in Japan. In the study, 255 patients were given 3 monthly doses of aflibercept, then randomized to either 2-week (n = 124) or 4-week (n = 123) intervals for injections. Intervals could be shortened or lengthened based on clinical factors, and the maximum interval was 16 weeks. Best corrected visual acuity gains were similar between the 2 groups at 52 weeks, with a mean gain of 9.0 letters for the 2-week group and 8.4 letters for the 4-week group.
Said Michael Devoy, MD, chief medical officer of Bayer, “This new treatment regimen for Eylea has the potential to reduce the number of injections and clinic visits to less than 4 in the second year for certain neovascular AMD patients, while still maintaining strong visual outcomes and the ability to see.”
Lower number of injections could also make a difference in costs. Aflibercept is more expensive than its fellow anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment bevacizumab, which is routinely used off-label to treat eye disorders. Recent reports have questioned whether aflibercept can compete with bevacizumab in terms of value; one paper from Europe suggested that, for aflibercept to be a justifiable alternative to bevacizumab, aflibercept should be reduced from €943 (approximately $1100) to €533 (approximately $622) per injection.
In addition to pressure to compete on cost, aflibercept is also being targeted by a number of biosimilar developers; Momenta Pharmaceuticals and Mylan have announced that they will begin a pivotal clinical trial of their jointly developed M710, and Alteogen has announced that it will file and Investigational New Drug application for its ALT-L9.
Reference
Wai KM, Singh RP. Treat and extend dosing regimen with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmic Clin Trails. 2018;1(1): 1-6. doi: 10.25259/AJOCT-2-2018.
Survey of Clinicians: Lower Cost of Biosimilars Is the Main Driver of Treatment Choice in IBD
September 7th 2024Researchers surveyed clinicians from 63 countries and found that adalimumab and infliximab biosimilars, primarily chosen for their lower cost, are widely available and have improved access to biologic treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
No Differences in Long-Term Drug Survival Between Biosimilar, Originator TNF Inhibitors
August 15th 2024An analysis of subcutaneous biosimilar and originator tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for rheumatic diseases found no significant differences in survival or discontinuation rates due to inefficacy or adverse events, with biosimilars showing lower overall discontinuation rates and higher retention rates.