The number of people who had annual prescription medication costs of $50,000 or more in 2016 was 35% higher than it was in 2014, according to pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts.
The number of people who had annual prescription medication costs of $50,000 or more in 2016 was 35% higher than it was in 2014, according to pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) Express Scripts.
The company’s new report, Super Spending: US Trends in High-Cost Medication Use, indicates that nearly 0.3% of Express Scripts members had annual medication costs at or greater than $50,000 in 2016. While 0.3% seems like a very small population, the company notes, it accounted for 21.3% of total pharmacy costs. “Extrapolating these data to the US population, an estimated 870,000 Americans accounted for $80 billion of the 2016 US pharmacy spend.”
Among those with $50,000 or more in prescription drug costs in 2016, more than 25% of costs were for oncology drugs, followed by drugs to treat multiple sclerosis (MS), inflammatory conditions, and hepatitis C. The report notes that all of the top therapy classes are for specialty medications, except for pain and inflammation. Specialty drugs include injectables (such as biologics and biosimilars) and non-injectable drugs typically used to treat chronic, complex conditions. Specialty drugs usually require 1 or more of the following:
The report reveals a significant shift in what drives spending among Americans with high annual pharmacy costs. Whereas in 2014, compounded medications and new hepatitis C therapies drove much of the spending among patients with $50,000 or more in annual pharmacy costs, in 2016, treatments for cancer, MS, inflammatory cystic fibrosis (CF), and other complex and rare diseases were the prominent drugs used in the high-cost population. The hepatitis C therapies and compounded medications that drove high costs in 2014 “virtually disappeared” from use in the 2016 report, replaced by safer and lower-cost alternatives, the company said.
The Express Scripts report was based on data gathered from anonymized prescription claims from 134,000 patients with high annual pharmacy costs among a group of 26 million Americans covered by commercial insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or health exchanges. The analysis accounted for drug manufacturer rebates and foundation grants.
Among the group of patients whose costs met or exceeded $50,000 annually, the percentage of costs were for treatments for the following:
The report broke down data by plan, age, region, and out of pocket (OOP) costs for patients who had $50,000 or more per year in drug costs:
The report also examined trends among patients with annual drug costs that exceeded $50,000. For those with prescription drug costs from $50,000 to $99,999, the percentage of costs were for treatments for the following:
Similarly, for patients with drug costs from $100,000 to $199,999 conditions treated were the following:
Patients with drug costs from $200,000 to $499,999 were treated for severe conditions, including pulmonary hypertension, CF, hemophilia, and hereditary angioedema. Those whose costs ranged from $500,000 to $999,999 were treated for severe congenital conditions including hemophilia, hereditary angioedema (HAE), central nervous system/autonomic disorders, and enzyme deficiencies. The number of patients whose drug costs reached $1 million went from 1 member per million members in 2014 to 2 members per million members in 2016. Half are being treated for HAE; others are treated for enzyme deficiencies and hemophilia.
Glen Stettin, MD, senior vice president of clinical, research and new solutions at Express Scripts, noted that medicine is entering an era where customized gene therapies offer hope for a cure for serious cancers and other rare, fatal diseases, necessitating the development of innovations to allow plan sponsors to have resources available to pay for new medications. “There’s no limit on innovation in medicine, and that’s a good thing for patients, physicians, and payers,” said Stettin. “Yet, there is a limit on the financial resources available to pay for medicine.”
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
Biosimilars Rheumatology Roundup for February 2024—Podcast Edition
March 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® revisited all the major rheumatology biosimilar news from February 2024, including the FDA approval of the 10th adalimumab biosimilar, the promise for an oral delivery system for ustekinumab, and the impact of adalimumab products on COVID-19 antibodies.
Global Biosimilar Market Projected to Reach $1.3 Trillion by 2032
April 11th 2024The global biosimilar market is projected to surge from $25.1 billion in 2022 to approximately $1.3 trillion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 17.6%, driven mainly by the increasing prevalence of cancer and the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars, as outlined in a report by Towards Healthcare.
Biosimilars Council: PBM Rebate Schemes Cost Americans, Payers $6 Billion
April 10th 2024A report from the Biosimilars Council evaluating IQVIA data found that rebate schemes orchestrated by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are costing US patients and payers billions of dollars by suppressing biosimilar adoption.