An American Medical Association survey of 1000 physicians regarding the impact of prior authorization (PA) found that most providers reported a significant or negative impact on patient care, and more than a quarter reported a serious adverse event.
An American Medical Association (AMA) survey of 1000 physicians regarding the impact of prior authorization (PA) found that most providers reported a significant or negative impact on patient care, and more than a quarter reported a serious adverse event (AE).
Serious AEs—death, hospitalization, disability, permanent body damage, or other life-threatening complication—were reported by 28% of respondents, and more than 9 in 10 respondents said PA had a significant or somewhat negative clinical impact.
The web-based survey was conducted in December 2018 and was answered by specialists (60%) and primary care physicians (40%).
The use of PAs has long been a concern of the AMA; according to the organization, utilization management programs—including PAs and step therapy—can create significant barriers for patient-centered care, as the manual, time-consuming processes often used in these programs place additional burdens on providers and direct resources away from patient care.
In the 2018 survey, doctors said that they or their staff spent 2 working days each week completing PAs, and 36% have staff whose sole job is to work on PAs. On average, practices complete 31 PAs per provider per week.
Not surprisingly, 86% of physicians reported that PAs created a high or extremely high burden for the office. In addition, 88% said the burden has increased over the last 5 years.
Other findings of the survey include:
The AMA noted that, traditionally, insurers applied PA to newer, more expensive services and medications. But in recent years, physicians have reported an increase in the volume of PAs.
For instance, at a 2017 annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, clinicians noted that PAs were increasing not only for expensive biologics to treat rheumatic diseases, but also for older, less-expensive medications such as steroid therapies or methotrexate. One presenter said the increasing volume of specialty drug prescriptions, steeper renewal requirements, insurance expansion, new therapeutics, and formulary updates were all factors behind the increased volume.
“The AMA survey continues to illustrate that poorly designed, opaque (PA) programs can pose an unreasonable and costly administrative obstacle to patient-centered care,” said AMA Board of Trustees Chair Jack Resneck Jr., MD, in a statement.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Hesitancy in MENA Nations to Adopt WHO Biosimilar Guidelines Hinders Market Development
July 17th 2024The World Health Organization’s (WHO) new guidelines for biosimilar approvals aim to save time and money for manufacturers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but hesitancy among nations to adopt the guidelines is stifling market development of biosimilars.
BioRationality: Time to Get Rid of PBMs if Biosimilars Are to Succeed
July 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, discusses the challenges with pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that plague the biosimilar industry and new legislation that attempts to reform their practices and encourage biosimilar adoption.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Hesitancy in MENA Nations to Adopt WHO Biosimilar Guidelines Hinders Market Development
July 17th 2024The World Health Organization’s (WHO) new guidelines for biosimilar approvals aim to save time and money for manufacturers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but hesitancy among nations to adopt the guidelines is stifling market development of biosimilars.
BioRationality: Time to Get Rid of PBMs if Biosimilars Are to Succeed
July 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, discusses the challenges with pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that plague the biosimilar industry and new legislation that attempts to reform their practices and encourage biosimilar adoption.
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512